Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
|
Author |
Message |
Rich5ltr
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 678 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2016 6:52 pm Post subject: Fire extinguishers? |
|
|
I may join the VSCC this year and participate in their tours & events. I see that a suggestion (if not a requirement) is that you carry a fir extinguisher.
That leads me to ask if people on here have any recommendations? I guess an extinguisher that looks vaguely vintage but that goes like it's in the 21stC would be ideal.
Thoughts? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray White
Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 6304 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Go for AFFF (aqueous film forming foam) type.
Do NOT go for powder type - these will ruin your car if there is a fire and that assumes that the vibrations from driving have not compacted the powder so it won't work anyway.
Importantly, place the fire extinguisher where it can be grabbed quickly. Not in the boot (if you have one) and never under the bonnet.
Have it serviced regularly and hope you never need it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rich5ltr
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 678 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the advice Ray, I'll start a search. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Keith D
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Posts: 1129 Location: Upper Swan, Western Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Veteran Car Club of Western Australia has had the rule that fire extinguishers MUST be carried in all club cars for many years. However, where they go depends on the owner.
My Austin Seven has one mounted flat on the floor between the front seats. The vintage Chrysler and Morris Cowley have theirs mounted on the rear floor, close behind the front seat. The A40 has hers mounted high in the boot.
Our fire department recommend the powder type. The powder does tend to compress, but the extinguishers have a gauge on the side that is divided into red and green. Green is OK and red is not! Over here they only cost about $22 each (10 pounds) so I always replace every two years but take them out of the car and give them a good shake and knock every few months to prevent compressing. When I replace them (after two years) the little boy in me comes out and I operate them! They all still work fine!
Keith D |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dipster
Joined: 06 Jan 2015 Posts: 408 Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ray White wrote: | Go for AFFF (aqueous film forming foam) type.
Do NOT go for powder type - these will ruin your car if there is a fire and that assumes that the vibrations from driving have not compacted the powder so it won't work anyway.
Importantly, place the fire extinguisher where it can be grabbed quickly. Not in the boot (if you have one) and never under the bonnet.
Have it serviced regularly and hope you never need it! |
Foam is fine (personally I carry powder) but you need to be careful using them. If you tackle a puddle of burning liquid be aware that just blasting it with the extinguisher can cause the burning liquid to be pushed away from the foam stream and possibly cause the fire to spread.
If you face such a fire place a small dam of foam behind and to the sides of the fire first to avoid this risk.
I would also recommend that you spend a little extra cash and have a training session. Some fire services offer these, perhaps your local one does. If not you can always do it yourself. But choose a safe spot, do not do so alone, always have someone around to help you in case it goes wrong...... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray White
Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 6304 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I forgot to mention that powder extinguishers are actually much better at knocking out a fire than foam and if you have a serious fire you might wish you had bought powder.
On the other hand, they are very corrosive and are a major problem to clean up after the fire.
When faced with these options, the choice of which extinguisher looks best seems less relevant somehow.
I think this is quite a hot topic.
See what I did there? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rich5ltr
Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 678 Location: Hampshire, UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2016 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed, I'm glad I started it. As you say appearance is incidental to the capabilities of the appliance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ka
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 600 Location: Orkney.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are basically four types of fire extinguishers, Red/Cream; Red/Blue; Red/Black; Red/Green: The black and green are gas type, so not ideal for outside use, this leaves us with Red/Blue (powder) Red/Cream (Foam/AFFF).
The Foam/AFFF are ideal for liquid fires, the AFFF is specifically designed for running fuel fires, Powder is the most flexible and the best for general fires involving multiple materials, as vehicles consist of.
The previous comments are correct, dry powder does compact with inactivity, and I have always recommended that before use they are inverted, (the references to the gauge just show the pressure within the extinguisher, called the expellent). The powder in Dry powder consists mainly of sodium bicarbonate, (baking powder), in a very fine consistency, with a metallic styrate to ensure that it remains dry. Yes this makes an incredible mess when used, but so does a burnt-out vehicle.
Should you select a foam type, these are made from a mechanically based process (think washing up liquid and water, then shaking). Older foam extinguishers used a chemical process, school days using sodium bicarbonate and vinegar, but were withdrawn many years ago.
The MSC (RAC) at their motorsport training days for marshals, advocate a combined AFFF and dry powder attack, the foam to cool the powder to blanket.
The best readily available option is the dry-powder, that is unless you have some of the old, withdrawn BCF or Halon 1211 extinguishers, that were ideal for vehicle fires! _________________ KA
Better three than four. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dipster
Joined: 06 Jan 2015 Posts: 408 Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very thorough explanation!
One other type that none of us have mentioned was the old brass Pyrene extinguishers. Basically a "bicycle pump" type of device filled with Carbon Tetrachloride ( I think it was). Very effective but also possibly lethal as the gas could asphixiate!
But the chemical also had another property, as a degreasing agent. My dear old dad used one once to clean oil off an oil contaminated clutch plate, caused by a leaking rear main bearing oil seal, to get us home. It was summer and a bee happened to be passing at the time and I remember seeing it fall to the ground instantly. I was young and quite sad.....
Last edited by Dipster on Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:31 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray White
Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 6304 Location: Derby
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alanb
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Posts: 516 Location: Berkshire.
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have one of the old CTC brass extinguishers in my Morris (not filled), does anyone know if there is a modern/safe liquid it could be filled with to make it useable again? _________________ old tourer
Morris 8 two seater |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dipster
Joined: 06 Jan 2015 Posts: 408 Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alanb wrote: | I have one of the old CTC brass extinguishers in my Morris (not filled), does anyone know if there is a modern/safe liquid it could be filled with to make it useable again? |
I would keep as a period piece as I would not be keen on relying on what must be very elderly seals retaining the liquid! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray White
Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 6304 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alanb wrote: | I have one of the old CTC brass extinguishers in my Morris (not filled), does anyone know if there is a modern/safe liquid it could be filled with to make it useable again? |
Since the use of carbon tetrachloride was generally banned in the 1990s (Montreal protocol) and no suitable alternative has been developed by the industry, I am assuming the answer must be no. Previously, Halon, as it was sometimes called proved to be highly toxic, a 'greenhouse' gas and a contributor to the depletion of the Ozone layer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Keith D
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Posts: 1129 Location: Upper Swan, Western Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Halon was a very effective fire extinguisher.
A fire needs three things; ignition, fuel and oxygen. Quite simply Halon removes oxygen from the air. It was used in electrical switch rooms extensively, but after it was released it quickly removed oxygen from the room and if a human was present, from their lungs. Death was very quick! Very sensibly it was banned many years ago. As Ray says, it was not the sort of stuff to have floating in the atmosphere!
Keith D |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ka
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 600 Location: Orkney.
|
Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
During one of the less tedious periods at Fire Service College, we had a professor talking about the 'square of combustion', not the triangle that was generally accepted. The recognised fuel/heat/oxygen arrangement is not quite correct. Fuel and heat are easily understood, the oxygen part does not need to be oxygen, just any of the gasses at this area of the periodic table, but as oxygen is the most commonest, this is the one that is mostly referred to. Water (red/red) gives the cooling effect, cutting the fuel is also easily understood (foam particularly with AFFF providing a molecular wide barrier between the vapour and the heat/oxygen). But gasses and dry powder work in a different way,back to the square. The prof talked about 'free radicals' that make the chemical reaction (fire) take place, and to cut a long lecture short, inhibiting these free radicals is the bit that extinguishes the fire. Gasses (CO2) and the older CTC, BCF, Halon were given a number that referred to their inhibitory effectiveness, as an example, it takes over twice as much CO2 to have the same effect as BCF once had, ie, around 12% CO2 compared with 6% of BCF.
Dry powder interferes with the production of these free radicals, having the same net effect.
To also add to the mix, normal dry powders, foam and gasses are ineffective on metal fires, so if you have an aluminum/magnesium gearbox casing (long lost Maestro's had a high magnesium proportion casing) these can only easily be extinguished by a purpose made extinguisher, or sand if you have it handy (the silicon in sand doing the job)
Class A: SOLIDS such as paper, wood, plastic etc
Class B: FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS such as paraffin, petrol, oil etc
Class C: FLAMMABLE GASES such as propane, butane, methane etc
Class D: METALS such as aluminium, magnesium, titanium etc
Class E: Fires involving ELECTRICAL APPARATUS
Enough, buy a dry-powder.......... _________________ KA
Better three than four. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
php BB powered © php BB Grp.
|