Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
|
Author |
Message |
stevel98
Joined: 04 Apr 2014 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:43 am Post subject: Electric E-Type.. |
|
|
..and there's me thinking that blue E-Type on the news recently was just another classic restoration!
https://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/classic-jaguar-e-type-goes-electric
Its a great idea and I hope that a few other classics live on with electric power, as, if I have to commute in an EV, then this would be better than a Nissan Leaf or similar.. Hopefully more derelict classics will find a new lease of life with electric power instead of rotting away because the IC motor's day's are numbered. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
petelang
Joined: 21 May 2009 Posts: 444 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's heresy. Someone should be taken out and shot!
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Penman
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4756 Location: Swindon, Wilts.
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I hope they have fitted a sound system to replicate the 6cyl's sounds. _________________ Bristols should always come in pairs.
Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lowdrag
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 1585 Location: Le Mans
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, having carefully examined the new DVLA proposals for changes next year, it will not be possible to change the engine for an electric motor without having the E-type's chassis number withdrawn and a new 17 digit VIN plate being issued, the car passing the IVA, and a Q plate being issued. If any of you out there have a car that is modified, especially the bodywork, then I suggest you read the consultation document very carefully. It would seem that a vast number of our beloved cars will fall into this tender trap, including mine. A Bentley saloon converted into a Le Mans body? Q plate sir. A DB4 remodeled to be a Zagato? Same thing. Engine modified to give more than 15% more power? Out out, I say! A Geoff Uren Cortina Savage? No chance. And so it goes on. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigJohn
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 954 Location: Wem, Shropshire
|
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Penman wrote: | Hi
I hope they have fitted a sound system to replicate the 6cyl's sounds. |
Nope, just a quiet Wooooosh and the rattle of silver top bottles.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alanb
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Posts: 516 Location: Berkshire.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Well, having carefully examined the new DVLA proposals for changes next year, it will not be possible to change the engine for an electric motor without having the E-type's chassis number withdrawn and a new 17 digit VIN plate being issued, the car passing the IVA, and a Q plate being issued. If any of you out there have a car that is modified, especially the bodywork, |
How do the hot rod boy get away with it? They advertise mot & tax exempt car then list the mods, new jag axles new rover v8 engines, bespoke chassis & chopped bodies and call it a Ford 10 hot rod. _________________ old tourer
Morris 8 two seater |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ukdave2002
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4104 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
alanb wrote: | Quote: | Well, having carefully examined the new DVLA proposals for changes next year, it will not be possible to change the engine for an electric motor without having the E-type's chassis number withdrawn and a new 17 digit VIN plate being issued, the car passing the IVA, and a Q plate being issued. If any of you out there have a car that is modified, especially the bodywork, |
How do the hot rod boy get away with it? They advertise mot & tax exempt car then list the mods, new jag axles new rover v8 engines, bespoke chassis & chopped bodies and call it a Ford 10 hot rod. |
I don't think it would be possible under the current DVLA regulations for a "Radically altered vehicle" A vehicle has to score 8 point sfrom the following table to retain its original identity, taxation class, registration plate; otherwise as lowdrag identifies its a IVA and Q plate.
5 of these points must come from having the original or new and unmodified chassis, monocoque bodyshell or frame.
Part - Points
Chassis, monocoque bodyshell (body and chassis as one unit) or frame - original or new and unmodified (direct from manufacturer) 5
Suspension (front and back) - original 2
Axles (both) - original 2
Transmission - original 2
Steering assembly - original 2
Engine - original 1
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lowdrag
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 1585 Location: Le Mans
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Most importantly, my car can score the eight points, but since the body shell has to make up five of the points it will not pass. Here we have not just hot rods but Bentley saloons converted to Le Mans replicas, GT40 replicas, C-type, D-type XKSS replicas (even if they are perfect copies) Bugattis, Austin Seven specials from the 30s, Ferraris, Aston Martins - the list goes on and on. The whole heritage of cars in the UK is being thrown out of the window. Now consider any car of no matter what make; has it the original engine, brakes, steering, has it been modified in any way? We are all in this boat that is sinking fast. Quietly, the DVLA launched a consultation paper, and the FBHVC latched on to this four years ago and have been pursuing the matter ever since. I have had a long discussion with them and the problem goes far deeper than you might think. Take the eponymous Morris 1000. How many have had an engine upgrade to a 1275CC, (let alone the Fiat-engined ones!) how many have fitted Spridget brakes? The car is now modified and not original. My E-type was changed years ago from the three-pot to four-pot calipers. Makes the car safer, but it is classified as modified. Apparently, and this is a statistic I didn't know, Triumphs form 4% of the historic vehicles existing and they reckon that 90% of their cars are modified in one form or another. We are all going to be caught in one way or another by these new regulations written by burocrats and not engineers. UNESCO class things of historic interest (and this includes cars) as anything over 30 years old, a definition that has been accepted in France for classic cars, but not in the UK. I could go on, but I suggest you take a look at the FBHVC web site and drop them an email quoting as many examples as you can. They have a meeting with the government officials Tuesday. To save you looking, here is the link:-
http://fbhvc.co.uk/about-us/news/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul fairall
Joined: 17 Nov 2016 Posts: 429 Location: North west Kent
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alanb wrote: | Quote: | Well, having carefully examined the new DVLA proposals for changes next year, it will not be possible to change the engine for an electric motor without having the E-type's chassis number withdrawn and a new 17 digit VIN plate being issued, the car passing the IVA, and a Q plate being issued. If any of you out there have a car that is modified, especially the bodywork, |
How do the hot rod boy get away with it? They advertise mot & tax exempt car then list the mods, new jag axles new rover v8 engines, bespoke chassis & chopped bodies and call it a Ford 10 hot rod. | they have been getting away with it since the 8 point rule came in, in 1998. But not for much longer. From May next year, questions will be asked when taxing vehicles. More than 15% increase in power to weight ratio means the vehicle will need an mot annually. Radically modified means loss of historic number plate. Iva test too. _________________ 1957 ford popular |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BigJohn
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 954 Location: Wem, Shropshire
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm intrigued as to how the relevant Gov. Dept. will work out the 15% power increase.
"Oh I say, that engine looks bored, stroked, and with a warm camshaft too, we must put it on a Dyno forthwith"?
I think the logistics of that won't work. I have a Mk1 Escort with a pushrod engine with 1100 on the rocker cover, ignoring visible external tuning parts a Kent engine looks the same across the board (an 1100 could be a 1300 or a 1360, a 1600 could be a 1700 or a 1760). Heads, Carbs etc. are interchangeable, inc. rocker covers.
How would a modern mechanic know the difference across all the makes of vehicles needed to be inspected? How would he know if my car had 1100/1300 suspension legs and brakes, or 1600 Mexico/RS2000/Capri 3 litre ones fitted? Am I meant to admit these things, old vehicles have had so many changes and modifications whilst in the bangernomics phase of their lives how would anyone know except an expert. This is excepting certain classic cars which tend to only need specific parts, Main stream family cars like Fords aren't included in that grouping |
|
Back to top |
|
|
petelang
Joined: 21 May 2009 Posts: 444 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Probably in league with the Insurance companies, who, let's face it, would love to find any reason not to pay out a claim in the event of "something happening" even if not your fault, who could insist on full disclosure of every aspect of modification, possibly even refusing to insure you unless the car was inspected, tested, whatever.
As everything is on the insurance database you would not get far without ANPR flagging up uninsured vehicles.
All part of the blending together of State departments and good old private business to help certain companies increase their profit opportunities.
OK, I'm cynical but........
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lowdrag
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 1585 Location: Le Mans
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BigJohn wrote: | I'm intrigued as to how the relevant Gov. Dept. will work out the 15% power increase.
"Oh I say, that engine looks bored, stroked, and with a warm camshaft too, we must put it on a Dyno forthwith"?
I think the logistics of that won't work. I have a Mk1 Escort with a pushrod engine with 1100 on the rocker cover, ignoring visible external tuning parts a Kent engine looks the same across the board (an 1100 could be a 1300 or a 1360, a 1600 could be a 1700 or a 1760). Heads, Carbs etc. are interchangeable, inc. rocker covers.
How would a modern mechanic know the difference across all the makes of vehicles needed to be inspected? How would he know if my car had 1100/1300 suspension legs and brakes, or 1600 Mexico/RS2000/Capri 3 litre ones fitted? Am I meant to admit these things, old vehicles have had so many changes and modifications whilst in the bangernomics phase of their lives how would anyone know except an expert. This is excepting certain classic cars which tend to only need specific parts, Main stream family cars like Fords aren't included in that grouping |
Well, as was said to me by the FBHVC, the same applies to mundane Moggies. If you are asked to tick the box on renewing your tax that your car is not modified, where does that leave you if stopped for speeding by dear PC Plod? Moreover, if you have an accident will you be insured? I am not saying one way or another, just posing the questions. Any car that has had a new body shell is now modified, and there are plenty of racers out there that have, and I can add my 380SL Mercedes which I rolled in 1984 to that list. This is one big, no, very big, can of worms here. In 1966 I had my 1275 Cooper S bored and stroked to 1293, added bigger carbs and a modified exhaust for rallying. We all did. Today we have Minis with 1340 engines, etc. My Jaguar engine has special pistons, high lift cams, and puts out far more power than a standard engine. One and all of these would now be excluded. Have you changed your wheels for Minilites? Have you added fat tyres? The list goes on and on, and unless we all act very quickly we are going to lose the majority of our heritage. Believe me, it is true. There is no time to lose. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul fairall
Joined: 17 Nov 2016 Posts: 429 Location: North west Kent
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
The 15% increase is a grey area difficult to enforce unless you remove your 30hp sidevalve and fit a 5.7 Chevy v8, a bit of a giveaway. _________________ 1957 ford popular |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Paul fairall
Joined: 17 Nov 2016 Posts: 429 Location: North west Kent
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
lowdrag wrote: | BigJohn wrote: | I'm intrigued as to how the relevant Gov. Dept. will work out the 15% power increase.
"Oh I say, that engine looks bored, stroked, and with a warm camshaft too, we must put it on a Dyno forthwith"?
I think the logistics of that won't work. I have a Mk1 Escort with a pushrod engine with 1100 on the rocker cover, ignoring visible external tuning parts a Kent engine looks the same across the board (an 1100 could be a 1300 or a 1360, a 1600 could be a 1700 or a 1760). Heads, Carbs etc. are interchangeable, inc. rocker covers.
How would a modern mechanic know the difference across all the makes of vehicles needed to be inspected? How would he know if my car had 1100/1300 suspension legs and brakes, or 1600 Mexico/RS2000/Capri 3 litre ones fitted? Am I meant to admit these things, old vehicles have had so many changes and modifications whilst in the bangernomics phase of their lives how would anyone know except an expert. This is excepting certain classic cars which tend to only need specific parts, Main stream family cars like Fords aren't included in that grouping |
Well, as was said to me by the FBHVC, the same applies to mundane Moggies. If you are asked to tick the box on renewing your tax that your car is not modified, where does that leave you if stopped for speeding by dear PC Plod? Moreover, if you have an accident will you be insured? I am not saying one way or another, just posing the questions. Any car that has had a new body shell is now modified, and there are plenty of racers out there that have, and I can add my 380SL Mercedes which I rolled in 1984 to that list. This is one big, no, very big, can of worms here. In 1966 I had my 1275 Cooper S bored and stroked to 1293, added bigger carbs and a modified exhaust for rallying. We all did. Today we have Minis with 1340 engines, etc. My Jaguar engine has special pistons, high lift cams, and puts out far more power than a standard engine. One and all of these would now be excluded. Have you changed your wheels for Minilites? Have you added fat tyres? The list goes on and on, and unless we all act very quickly we are going to lose the majority of our heritage. Believe me, it is true. There is no time to lose. | i read that this has been passed by parliament and comes into force in May next year so is already done and dusted. _________________ 1957 ford popular |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ukdave2002
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4104 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is this a regulation that will be implemented retrospectively ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
php BB powered © php BB Grp.
|