|
Author |
Message |
roverdriver
Joined: 18 Oct 2008 Posts: 1210 Location: 100 miles from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:37 am Post subject: Water Injectors |
|
|
Rustyrecks has mentioned a Water Injector in the HHO Fuel Cell thread.
I remember that here in Aus., water injectors were commonplace in the 1950's. Unfortunately I was too young to take a detailed interest in them, but I had the impression that one purpose for fitting one was to assist in the combustion of low octane fuels in engines with a compression more suited to higher octane.
As far as I know, they were all after-market add-ons, however motoring magazines of the period had many adverts for them.
I am very interested in knowing the theory and practice surrounding their use. In spite of what I have said above, I have memories of them being fitted to a wide range of vehicles, from Ford T's to a Vauxhall Wyvern.
Please enlighten me! _________________ Dane- roverdriver but not a Viking. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peter scott
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7118 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it not a case of cooling the mixture, reducing its volume and you can thereby suck in more.
Peter _________________ http://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peppiB
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 686 Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
47Jag
Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bothwell, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rover,
I recall reading that London Transport had experimented with water injection on their buses. It apparently removes all the carbon from the combustion chamber as well. I tried it on my Austin A70 in the early 60s but had neither skill or knowledge as to how to regulate the flow. I had a pipe from the inlet manifold sucking thru' a small carburettor jet.
Art |
|
Back to top |
|
|
47Jag
Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bothwell, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Peter,
My understanding was that it increased the volume. This is the reason that engines give more power when it's damp.
Art |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick Site Admin
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 22439 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peter scott
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7118 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
47Jag wrote: | Peter,
My understanding was that it increased the volume. This is the reason that engines give more power when it's damp.
Art |
I think that without a turbo or superchager the volume remains the same i.e. (at max) the swept volume of the cylinder but if the mixture is cooled then you can get more molecules into the cylinder in a given sweep.
Quote: |
Is this the same as the water injection option that was available on the Saab 99 turbo in the late 70s?
Rick |
Yes, I think it's all the same game. An intercooler also performs this mixture cooling. In fact is the Saab system not spraying water into the intercooler rather than into the induction stream?
Peter _________________ http://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick Site Admin
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 22439 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Yes, I think it's all the same game. An intercooler also performs this mixture cooling. In fact is the Saab system not spraying water into the intercooler rather than into the induction stream?
Peter |
I'm not sure that these first generation Saab turbos had intercoolers at all, ISTR it came in on later H series 16v engines
Rick _________________ Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Last edited by Rick on Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
47Jag
Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bothwell, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Peter,
Wrong word...... I should have said DENSITY of the charge.
Art |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jim Walker
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Posts: 124 Location: Chesterfield, Derbys.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I seem to remember that while water injection caused a greater quantity of air to be induced by having an added refrigerating effect caused by the drop in pressure through the carb. venturi, this only caused a weaker mixture because the petrol supplied via the jets remains the same. Some means of richening the fuel supplied is also needed.
If water injection alone increases engine performance the engine was probably running rich anyway.
Jim Walker. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
magic9r
Joined: 13 Dec 2008 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Do car runs weak on a cold day?
No, they run better because the air is denser and as carburettors are a crude but effective mass flow sensing mixture control, they still work with hotter and colder air within limits, on the cold side at least down to the point where the carb ices.
Nick |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|