Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
|
Author |
Message |
nickjaxe
Joined: 14 Jun 2013 Posts: 36 Location: North Cheshire
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:43 am Post subject: Does ignition timing needs retarding with modern fuel. |
|
|
Hi all was hoping somebody may be able to shed some light on something I have come across with my 1960s vehicle...its a motorcycle but wondering in general terms how owners of various types of vehicle find ignition static ignition timing with modern petrol with ethanol
So have any of you guys have had to move away from manufacturers book static ignition timing.
My 1969 2 stroke BSA Bantam when it was built had a book static timing of 16.5deg btdc....the timing is not adjustable on the move.
It doesn't like the 16.5 deg setting these days and needs to be around 15 deg BTDC.
I was wondering if anybody else has found the same.
I am thinking its down to the ethanol in our petrol...some say it has a slightly slower but rate some say a faster burn rate.
Love to hear your comments. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbBlfYO46mI
My other hobby. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alastairq
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Posts: 1950 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi..you have asked the same question in your post above.
Yes, timing has to be adjusted...as does mixture. Nothing To do directly with ethanol in petrol...everything to do with the rest of the stuff that makes up petrol.
Ethanol has been around in fuel for a long time....and, historically, was old under the Cleveland Discol banner right up until the late 1970's.....
For years now quite a lot of petrol has contained up to 5% ethanol.
The ethanol issue has become a bandwagon which the banal [ie, not serious?] media have cottoned onto.
You have a link I posted in your other thread.....to a publication of results conducted by Manchester University, into the effects of modern petrols, and old technology engines.
They are quite an eye opener....and dispel much of the boswellox and urban myth surrounding ethanol, promoted by the casual press & media.
Worth a good read....3 or 4 times....and should be in there along with the Highway Code, for any sort of motoring enthusiast..... _________________ Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peter scott
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7118 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
My understanding (for what it's worth) is that modern fuels have an octane rating rather lower than we had back in the 1960s so engines with higher compression ratios from back then will tend to detonation.
I suspect retarding the ignition might not fully resolve the problem and putting a compression plate sandwich in place of the head gasket might be better.
My own old vehicle is pre-war and has a CR of 7.6:1 so it doesn't have a problem and it is particularly insensitive to ignition timing anyway.
BTW I do like your other hobby and the ELO music (You must get YouTube complaining about copyright though.)
Peter _________________ http://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alastairq
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Posts: 1950 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | My understanding (for what it's worth) is that modern fuels have an octane rating rather lower than we had back in the 1960s so engines with higher compression ratios from back then will tend to detonation. |
Not so.
Octane ratings are octane ratings.
The methods of measurement of octane ratings haven't changed.
Thus, 95 octane petrol [ordinary unleaded today, E5]..sold today has the same octane rating as 95 octane petrol sold in 1960!
98 octane fuel [todays super unleaded....or similar] has the same octane rating as 98 octane petrol of the 1960's.
What HAS changed between then, and now [or, back then, and 20 years ago?]....are the constituent chemicals that make up 'petrol'.
These have affected the way petrol behaves......and are a reason why the 'shelf life' of modern petrol can be measured in weeks..or a month or so at best. Unlike 1960's petrol.
Which is why I have suggested that fesj fuel to suit the season is used...and why petrol bought in January is different in its make-up, to petrol bought in July?
It can also be a reason why buying petrol from a little used retailer may lead to putting 'out-of-season' fuel in one's tank? [There Isn't the turnover of fuel in small, less well used retailers]
But...don't ever ever take MY word for it....get hold of a copy of the book I've constantly linked to...read the results and conclusions of the tests carried out at Manchester University, on an old-design of engine....[in good nick, I hasten to add].....and a variety of today's normally available fuels?
[Engine used was an MG XPAG motor]
I hasten to add, the book contains the results of the myriad of tests conducted. It contains conclusions formed by those results.
It doesn't contain advice.
It does, however, lay to rest a lot of the current urban myth that is being promulgated by the press, the media, and even my bank, FFS.
There's nothing like knowing the proven [scientific] facts of the matter. _________________ Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peter scott
Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7118 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
I know I didn't express it very well but I just meant that hundred and what ever octane petrol is no longer available on the average forecourt. No avgas.
Peter _________________ http://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alastairq
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Posts: 1950 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aaaah...different story then? But..as far as I can recall, the highest generally available octane rating back i the 1960's was 100 octane [what used to be known as 5 star petrol?]
If one has an engine which can only use 100 octane fuel....then one has some choices.
First, use 98 octane [so-called super unleaded, ]... If the engine pinks on that, then add some octane booster each fill-up?
Second choice, is to convert to LPG fuelling [which is, over 100 octane].
Third choice is to buy one of the specialist [racing] fuels, at around £4 a litre, and use that. these can be had with a variety of octane ratings.
Of course, one's engine has to be free of other influences which can cause pinking..for example, like attempting to reduce cyclic variation...[the timing of the burn of the mix].
Not many engine in regular use that require 100 octane fuels....
Personally, Id find some 98 octane petrol with 10% ethanol in it. _________________ Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
petelang
Joined: 21 May 2009 Posts: 442 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Beginning to look like Alastair's pension fund is allied to book publishers...
Can anyone post the salient extracts as I shouldn't think there will be enough copies to go round..
Peter |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Miken
Joined: 24 Dec 2012 Posts: 544
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is the answer to get your old car or bike set up on a rolling road? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray White
Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 6304 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2020 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
petelang wrote: | Beginning to look like Alastair's pension fund is allied to book publishers...
Can anyone post the salient extracts as I shouldn't think there will be enough copies to go round..
Peter |
Peter. I would find it hard to justify paying out for the book when all the information I need is freely available. Go to the on line MG magazine - 'TotallyT type 2'. There you will find detailed experiments with an XPAG engine aimed at getting a better understanding of what is going on with our petrol. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alastairq
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Posts: 1950 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2020 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
petelang wrote: | Beginning to look like Alastair's pension fund is allied to book publishers...
Can anyone post the salient extracts as I shouldn't think there will be enough copies to go round..
Peter |
Nope...just trying to get rid of theurban bullshyte that seems to surround this whole issue.
The link is to the book. How one gets hold of it is another matter.
The online extracts don;t give the complete picture...nor do they provide all the salient points.
Which is why the book was published.
The online extracts make that point very clearly.
There are no real ''salient points'.....for, to understand the issues, one has to have a basic understanding of all the parameters, the what, and how, the tests were conducted.
The pages of suggestions....pointedly, not advice...just suggestions, don't work if the reader does not have an understanding of the conclusions from the tests, and how they were arrived at.
Quote: | eter. I would find it hard to justify paying out for the book when all the information I need is freely available. Go to the on line MG magazine - 'Totally T type 2'. There you will find detailed experiments with an XPAG engine aimed at getting a better understanding of what is going on with our petrol.
|
The magazine report is incomplete, and admits so.
I looked at the online version, and it leaves more questions, than it answers. The author admits this much as well. [Paul Ireland]
I got my copy of the book for 8 quid. Not from the publisher I linked to,either.
But most of us don't think twice about paying out 10 times that amount, for what may be deemed as trivia.
The real problem is..people have questions surrounding these matters......questions that could be better answered if appropriate research was conducted.
Rather than engage in perpetuating urban myth....or giving answers I am not technically qualified to give....I'd rather point people in the direction f proper test results.
If questions still remain, then there is a basic email system setup for the author of the tests to respond to questions.
I have used this system to ask a question, that was relevant to Ford sidevalve engines.....I got an answer........fro the author himself.
The MG link is really a bit of a red herring. A pure coincidence.....and an incomplete one at that. _________________ Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ukdave2002
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4104 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Fri Aug 14, 2020 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
peter scott wrote: | BTW I do like your other hobby and the ELO music (You must get YouTube complaining about copyright though.)
Peter |
I was expecting to hear "Don't Bring me down" !! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
php BB powered © php BB Grp.
|