Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
|
Author |
Message |
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are those vents along the top edges ?
If it is galvanised or dipped zinc plated steel lining, could it have been a livestock carrier ? The front compartment with exterior door to store supplies, tools etc.
Any evidence of fixtures for tethering/support ?
What is the outer skin material under the paint ?
If the interior was intended to be hosed out, then the folding and seams would be in arranged to ensure drainage and not seepage. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1735 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterwpg wrote: |
If it is galvanised or dipped zinc plated steel lining, could it have been a livestock carrier ? The front compartment with exterior door to store supplies, tools etc. |
Going on the quoted size I doubt it was used for livestock - it's a bit small for horses or cattle, you wouldn't even get many sheep inside and in any case sheep were more usually herded along the road at the time this vehicle would have been current.
The front compartment puzzles me as well, but it could have been for storing protective clothing used by the men carting stuff off to be fumigated. Nothing like the disposable "onesies" of today of course, but certainly gloves, wellies and long oilskins or similar, stuff that you wouldn't want to drive in or risk bugs in the cab.
peterwpg wrote: |
If the interior was intended to be hosed out, then the folding and seams would be in arranged to ensure drainage and not seepage. |
Presumably so, or it wouldn't have lasted this long. I wonder if the seams are soldered? Zinc isn't the easiest material to solder but it's quite doable, and of course skilled men to do so would have been easier to find back then, especially in a big city like London. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
From what I know of the furniture moving business, even in the 1960's and into the 70's there was little importance placed on fumigating furniture to prevent the transference of bugs.
The lining of this van body would be zinc coated steel, whether dipped or electroplated. A close inspection should reveal which. Dipping resulted in a heavier and rougher surface from sheets that were electroplated.
If there are vents around the top, then why think about fumigation. A fumigation process would likely want to prevent gasses escaping.
Whatever was in the front compartment, it must have been thought necessary to keep it isolated from whatever was in the main body.
I think it was built for specific chassis (one or more) , because of the wheel arches.
If it was a live animal carrier, wouldn't there be a loading ramp. ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
science museum
Joined: 19 Feb 2015 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2015 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello again
The one thing we are sure about this van body is that it was used for transporting personal belongings to be fumigated. We acquired it from Lambeth Council's Enviromental Services Dept, where it had been sitting for many years. The fumigation itself would have taken place elsewhere, but having transported 'infested' belongings it needed to be cleaned effectively - hence the lining.
Our hope it to shed light on the maker / model as this can help us pin down when in was active. We have so focussed on c1920-1940, during which time there are references made to an Albion, two Ford's and two Morris's being used as fumigation vans (and we also have a possible reference to a Bedford).
As for the outer surface, it's wood of some type. While the sides were painted, there was originally a 'fabric' covering over the roof planks which apparently 'blew off in a storm' shortly before it was given to us.
Ongoing thanks
Stewart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
roverdriver
Joined: 18 Oct 2008 Posts: 1210 Location: 100 miles from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some measurements might help identify which chassis of motor vehicle it might have fitted. The distance from the front of the body to the center of the rear mudguard could establish an approximate length of chassis (one would have to guestimate the distance from the front of the chassis to the front of the body) . An examination of the underside might show the points where the frame was in contact with a metal chassis and that could help too, for example, a Ford T or TT chassis had no crossmembers apart from the very front and the very rear.
It is just possible that somewhere there is either an inked 'brand' or a stamped mark (that is pressed into the wood) giving maker, or numbers that might give a clue. Such a mark would usually be somewhere around the front, usually on a vertical surface.
Your photos don't show the very front of the body. That might offer some clues. Is there a driver's seat there, or evidence of one having been there?
A painted canvas roof would be a fairly usual feature of a body of this period. Often supported by lathes, a canvas cover with several coats of paint was quite waterproof. _________________ Dane- roverdriver but not a Viking. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PAUL BEAUMONT
Joined: 27 Nov 2007 Posts: 1281 Location: Barnsley S. Yorks
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2015 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have watched this with interest and a couple of thoughts that have not yet been expressed: Emmerson's point is interesting in that the body has no cab. I would have thought, for its period, that it would have had at least an integral "C" cab. The fact that it does not makes me wonder if it was a trailer and not a van in its own right.
Probably the most useful measurement would be those of the fixings that once attached it to a chassis and maybe any sort of rust markings etc on the underside that might indicate where the chassis touched it etc. I suspect the sentiment that it was purpose built is correct and that the craftsman possibly built it on its chassis so any details from beneath it could be invaluable in trying to pinpoint a likely chassis.
Paul |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
science museum
Joined: 19 Feb 2015 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Many thanks for further comments.
Re Paul's comments: My feeling is that is it was not a trailer, but, as you also suggest, quite possibly purpose built for a particular chassis. And it is identifying the chassis that could help us pinpoint it in time.
Further clues may well be on the van body and I will try and get one of my colleagues to investigate further (it's currently out in Wiltshire in one of the former aircraft hangars that we use to store our larger objects)
Thanks
Stewart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rick Site Admin
Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 22449 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Penman
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4759 Location: Swindon, Wilts.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I don't see how it could be a trailer with the wheel arches that far back.
Rick
Here is a teaser for you, it was the only shot I got inside the day I went, battery failed and no spares with me.
_________________ Bristols should always come in pairs.
Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Penman
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4759 Location: Swindon, Wilts.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Peter
That's the easy one, what about the three aircraft.
I was actually using teaser in a different sense as in I was being a tease by showing what he can't currently go and see. _________________ Bristols should always come in pairs.
Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Mon Mar 09, 2015 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Penman wrote: | Hi Peter
That's the easy one, what about the three aircraft.
I was actually using teaser in a different sense as in I was being a tease by showing what he can't currently go and see. |
You know what, I had an idea you would ask that question. When did the guys on here become clever. ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ka
Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 600 Location: Orkney.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brings back memories looking at the Dennis, I did my initial training using one of these and a Green Goddess. The older hands told some interesting stories about the petrol engined Dennis, by the time I had passed my HGV, I drove an ERF, with a wheeled escape hanging off the back. No power steering, drum brakes, 5 speed crash box, you certainly learnt to be in the correct gear entering a corner to drive through and out of it, and brakes where you had one of two good stops. then faded away just like early Minis. _________________ KA
Better three than four. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
php BB powered © php BB Grp.
|