classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

"Under-wheeled" old cars
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat
Author Message
Rick
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 22447
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:38 pm    Post subject: "Under-wheeled" old cars Reply with quote

Evening all,

Following on from a point that badhuis made (see below), which classics do look a little under-endowed in the wheel size department, in your eyes?

I had a similar discussion with a friend of mine only the other day, while perusing a Rolls-Royce Camargue that's due a little TLC. The wheels, the rear track in particular, look a little out of place IMO.

Factory photo:


Badhuis' original post:
"There are some cars for which I think bigger wheels would suit it better. Not that I am a big fan of the huge wheels nowadays, but there was a time (sixties) when it was "modern" to go to smaller wheels. Austin Westminster (a big car) only had 14" and went even further to 13". Hillman Minx had 15" which looked good on the car, and got 13" at the end. One of the many mis-steps the car factories made in the mid to late sixties."

RJ
_________________
Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 1954
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I 'think' this was done to improve ride & handling.

Skoda did similar with the Estelle...originally on 14 inch wheels, they went down to 13 inch..handling improved. [already top-notch good, anyway....only spoilt by drivers who didn't 'know' how to corner correctly!!]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badhuis



Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 1390
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Alvis TD/E/F series is one example:


_________________
a car stops being fun when it becomes an investment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rick
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 22447
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would we be thinking these thoughts when the cars were current, I wonder, or are we conditioned now to cars having larger wheel & tyre combinations, that fill the arches more?



RJ
_________________
Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badhuis



Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 1390
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The MG TC is beautifully proportioned whereas its successor is a bit under wheeled.




_________________
a car stops being fun when it becomes an investment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
47Jag



Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 1480
Location: Bothwell, Scotland

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn’t the Mark X Jaguar only have 14” wheels. It always looks grossly under-tyres to me.”

https://i0.wp.com/www.curbsideclassic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/1963-Jaguar-mkX.jpg

Art
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
47Jag



Joined: 26 Jun 2008
Posts: 1480
Location: Bothwell, Scotland

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Doesn’t the Mark X Jaguar only have 14” wheels. It always looks grossly under-tyres to me.”

https://i0.wp.com/www.curbsideclassic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/1963-Jaguar-mkX.jpg

Art
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
badhuis



Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 1390
Location: Netherlands

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most post-sixties Bristols have wheels too small:




_________________
a car stops being fun when it becomes an investment
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rick
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 22447
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yet somehow the original Minis look just right on tiddly 10" wheels, I think.



RJ
_________________
Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 1954
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about 'rolling radius', when comparing the likes of a TC MG, with a TD?

Plus, there's what's available in new tyre technologies from the tyre makers?

Smaller wheel/tyre diameter means less heavy stuff flailing around on each corner?

Appearance, versus better dynamics?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 1954
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 7:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rick wrote:
Yet somehow the original Minis look just right on tiddly 10" wheels, I think.



RJ


And..they went up in size as the years passed?

To do with 'tyre availability', perhaps?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikeC



Joined: 31 Jul 2009
Posts: 1775
Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Smaller wheels were fitted to allow for larger (wider) tyres, thus improving the ride, roadholding and handling. The low profile tyres with which we are now familiar did not appear until the late 1980s. and then they had only a 70 or 80 aspect ratio.

In the main I think classics look better with their original wheel/tyre size, although I agree that later versions of what is basically the same car - say a Hillman Minx - look better on their earlier specification wheels - but I bet they don't ride and handle as well!
_________________
in the garage: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
Recently departed: 1953 Lancia Appia, 1931 Austin Seven, 1967 Singer Chamois, 1914 Saxon, 1930 Morris Cowley, 1936 BSA Scout, 1958 Lancia Appia coupe, 1922 Star 11.9 ... the list goes on!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Penman



Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 4756
Location: Swindon, Wilts.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi
I used to instruct on 10" wheel minis, when doing a TiR, if the road was a bit too wide the car would be at right angles to the kerb at the end oif the first move and if the pupil didn't stop in time the gearbox hit the kerb edge because it protruded forward of the tyres.

I had an idea that some of the later ones had 12" wheels. I am just imagining that?
_________________
Bristols should always come in pairs.

Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bitumen Boy



Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 1735
Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 9:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Penman wrote:
Hi
I used to instruct on 10" wheel minis, when doing a TiR, if the road was a bit too wide the car would be at right angles to the kerb at the end oif the first move and if the pupil didn't stop in time the gearbox hit the kerb edge because it protruded forward of the tyres.

I had an idea that some of the later ones had 12" wheels. I am just imagining that?


12" wheels became standard after, IIRC, 1984, though of course people had been fitting them as a mod for a long time before that. I suspect the factory started fitting the larger wheels as a simple and cheap method of raising the gearing on a car that was already rather long in the tooth by then. My last one was an '87 model that was quite happy doing an (indicated) 80mph on the M5 when the occasion demanded it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 1954
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 11:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

......................and enabled the fitting of larger brakes, perhaps?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.