classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

When the Jaguar XJ6 was new!
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat
Author Message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7075
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:58 pm    Post subject: When the Jaguar XJ6 was new! Reply with quote

I expect some of you will have seen this but it is always good to remind ourselves just how great the original concept was. This was my Dad's favourite car ..but I never could work out why he never had one.

https://club.shannons.com.au/club/forum/general/video-1968-launch-of-the-jaguar-xj6/#gallery
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bjacko



Joined: 28 Oct 2013
Posts: 516
Location: Melbourne Australia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 6:51 am    Post subject: Jaguar XJ6 Reply with quote

They had a bad reputation here for reliability and poor workmanship. I had a friend who was a mechanic who worked on all sorts of vehicles and the boss had a XJ6 but was always breaking down and he had to fix it. Told me never buy a Jaguar until they improve.
_________________
1938 Morris 8 Ser II Coupe Utility (Pickup)
1985 Rover SD1 VDP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7075
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 9:55 am    Post subject: Re: Jaguar XJ6 Reply with quote

bjacko wrote:
They had a bad reputation here for reliability and poor workmanship. I had a friend who was a mechanic who worked on all sorts of vehicles and the boss had a XJ6 but was always breaking down and he had to fix it. Told me never buy a Jaguar until they improve.


I think you are talking about the series 2. They looked similar but by then BL had sunk to it's lowest point and the XJ6 had become a joke.

The Series 1 was not without it's teething troubles but generally speaking they were a good car. Such a shame everything went downhill from there until Sir John Egan rescued the company but by then the cars had changed completely and become bland and uninspiring. Sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rusty



Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 271
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia

PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 10:26 am    Post subject: Re: Jaguar XJ6 Reply with quote

bjacko wrote:
They had a bad reputation here for reliability and poor workmanship. I had a friend who was a mechanic who worked on all sorts of vehicles and the boss had a XJ6 but was always breaking down and he had to fix it. Told me never buy a Jaguar until they improve.


Your friend doesn't know what he is talking about !

When I started my apprenticeship as a motor mechanic with Winterbottom motors in Perth, (the local "distributor" for all things Leyland), the series 1 XJ6 was the then current model, and they were a very reliable and well put together car. There was a brief period where British Leyland had a toxic relationship with their workers, resulting in strikes and intentional sabotage of their products which led to shipping delays for parts and short cuts having to be made to keep "warranty" cars on the road, and that was a headache for management, but that was about 1973 and was only an issue for about 6 months. The later and earlier cars were quite good.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7075
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Thu Feb 13, 2025 1:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rusty, I think you are correct. The Series 1 XJ6 was something of a revelation when it was released - although at the time I lamented the deletion of polished walnut that had been a hallmark of previous models.

When I trained as a mechanic I never had the chance to work on an XJ6 but did most of my work on Mk2 and Mk10/420G models which I loved. I still think the XK engine is a work of art; it is just a shame that so many later owners neglected oil changes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Vintage Fly Guy



Joined: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 170

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I remember it, it was the front and rear valances that let the XJ6 and its variants down, with rust taking hold in pretty short order, which gave the appearance of an otherwise fine executive car all the charm of being a dodgy old 'scrapper'!

Putting this in periodic context, the front valance/spoiler of the Ford Cortina and Granada of similar period fared no better; after two years of entirely predictable commercial mileage figures, they too usually began to exhibit the completion of a well-done peperoni pizza!

We 'classic car enthusiasts' can say what we want about modern cars being too mechanically complicated and reliant upon electronics, but at least the manufacturers seem to have sorted the rust issue out.


Last edited by Vintage Fly Guy on Fri Feb 14, 2025 1:09 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7075
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 1:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rust has always been the enemy! I think manufacturers purposely left their products vulnerable to the effects of our environment to encourage a quicker turn around of new car sales. They would not like to know that their cars lasted for many years; rather, that the scrap yards were full and the showrooms doing a roaring trade.

As I have said before: "even having a Rolls Royce badge on the front won't stop it rom rusting at the back.!"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rusty



Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 271
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 1:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rust was sometimes an issue, around the rear axle assembly and the rear quarters mostly, but we are lucky out here, warm dry climate and "no" salt on the road so they lasted quite well. If maintenance on the engine and drivetrain was done properly, they pretty much lasted the life of the car. Timing chains could be an issue, and I remember some having a bad cylinder which had been bored oversize by a small amount at the factory, and the Forman and leading hands recond it was probably sabotage by an employee, but that "may" have been a bit later after the problems with workers started. I know British Leyland wouldn't bore out the whole engine to fix it under warranty, so they only bored the offending cylinder .010 and fitted one new piston. There were some that had a few electrical "gremlins" that took a bit of sorting out. I couldn't have been too worried about their issues because I always wanted one and nearly bought one once, but then talked myself out of it because "what do I need a 4.2 litre jag for?, too big !" so I bought a Volvo 244 instead because 4 cylinders and good reputation! BULLDUST !!! worst car I have ever owned, wish I had bought the jag, or the other one on the possibility's list at the time a Peugeot 505.
Anyway, I worked on Jags (and other BL cars) for 8 years and still hold them in high regard now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Norseman



Joined: 09 Jan 2019
Posts: 114
Location: Essex UK

PostPosted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 11:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vintage Fly Guy wrote:

We 'classic car enthusiasts' can say what we want about modern cars being too mechanically complicated and reliant upon electronics, but at least the manufacturers seem to have sorted the rust issue out.


There are a few LR/JLR owners that would disagree with you Rolling Eyes
_________________
1987 classic Range Rover Vogue auto
1998 E39 523i SE auto sedan

A great many models have served me well since the 'sixties, all of them old & some even older than me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
V8 Nutter



Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 601

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had an American friend who worked for many years in the UK and he became quite Anglicised. When he returned home he bought a new XJ6, it was good mechanically but it was plagued with electrical problems, the dealer never managed to sort out. After about 2 years he sold it at a great loss.
Concerning Rusty's comments about Volvos, when I worked at an engine reconditioners we had a spate of Volvo 4 cylinders come in with about 40,000 miles on the clock and completely worn out camshafts
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7075
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 1:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't empathise enough that it was the series 2 which dragged down the XJ6 reputation. The Series one was a game changer for Jaguar. They put everything into it... but there are always some people who just can't leave well alone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Vintage Fly Guy



Joined: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Norseman wrote:
Vintage Fly Guy wrote:

We 'classic car enthusiasts' can say what we want about modern cars being too mechanically complicated and reliant upon electronics, but at least the manufacturers seem to have sorted the rust issue out.


There are a few LR/JLR owners that would disagree with you Rolling Eyes


My daily driver is a 2005 LR Discovery 3 TDV6 auto, which I've owned since it was two years old. It's still structurally sound and the only visible rusting is at the bottom of the rear wheel arches, and that's only a bit of discolouration, which I spray with GT85 from time to time to keep it at bay. It's done 175,000 miles and still runs as sweet as a nut and drives impeccably.

If it was an unreliable rust-bucket then it would have been sold on many years ago, but I'm keeping it and will run it into the ground rather than buy the new version, with particulate filters that clog, crankshafts that have been known to snap if you get a bad one, alloy timing pulleys that have been known to fail if you get a bad one, and ever more complex electronic systems that tie you to a main dealer or dedicated independent specialist garage for servicing and repair.

Then there's the insurance issue with more modern LR/Range Rover products, due to the keyless entry system (until recently) being able to be hacked and the vehicle stolen in a matter of seconds! Unfortunately, this got the entire range tarred with the same brush, to the extent that insurers didn't want to cover them, or charged a small fortune to do so.

I was going to change my aging Discovery for a new/newish Range Rover sport, but the insurance issue (quotes of three thousand plus for a rural area and twenty thousand plus for London, per year for fully comprehensive insurance) put me off that idea a year or so ago! Even without the insurance issue, the feeling I was driving something that could suddenly cost me ten thousand pounds to replace the engine on (if it's an unlucky dud) still puts me off.

So, I'll keep my old Discovery going for a couple more years, it's going to cost me around three thousand or so at the end of this month, as it needs two new rear suspension top arms, it's time to change the front and rear timing belts (and I may as well get the oil pump replaced for peace of mind and a couple of hundred quid while they're in there), plus the other odds and sods it will need for an MOT. However, I'd have lost more than that in 12 months depreciation alone if I'd spent around fifty thousand quid or so on a two year old Range Rover Sport, and significantly more than that if I'd bought a new one!

The above made me completely re-think my car-buying strategy, to the extent that I'm currently considering buying another classic car instead; most likely an E-Type 2+2 fixed head coupe. In 10 years time I know which of the two should be worth closer to what I paid for it, and I know which of the two will give me more joy of ownership.

The way I'm currently thinking, I'll smoke round in my old Discovery (in total comfort), not worry about parking it in the supermarket or hospital car park, etc., and have another classic vehicle to enjoy at weekends and for high days and holidays.

So have I lost the plot, or is buying a new/newish car at the current time a mug's game, particularly considering the uncertainty over which alternative fuel system will win out (EV/hybrid/hdrogen, etc.)?


Last edited by Vintage Fly Guy on Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:15 pm; edited 5 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vintage Fly Guy



Joined: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 11:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duplicate.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7075
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 1:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vintage Fly Guy wrote:

So have I lost the plot, or is buying a new/newish car at the current time a mug's game, particularly considering the uncertainty over which alternative fuel system will win out (EV/hybrid/hdrogen, etc.)?


I am in a similar position with my 2000 P38. The later models are even less user friendly than this one. If I want to clear the dash of an unwanted message I have a "kicker" that simply plugs into the system and does the job that a main dealer would charge me for.

If the air suspension plays up I have some shrader valves as a stand by.

The only time the car has let me down was a petrol pump failure and that was not a DIY job and could happen to anyone.

Unfortunately, I can no longer get LPG locally and the petrol consumption is heavy.
My only consolation is that I don't do much mileage these days.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Norseman



Joined: 09 Jan 2019
Posts: 114
Location: Essex UK

PostPosted: Sun Feb 16, 2025 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm in total harmony with both you guys as my LR days go back to the 'eighties when I green-laned & competed in club trials,. though I had my first 'series' back in the 'sixties.

My current RR classic will be 38 years old come June this year when it will have been owned for 17 years & still only 64k miles.

Frankly I wouldn't touch a JLR product with a barge pole, or in fact any new car as they are literally disposable items, just like household white goods.

Our 'daily' is coming up for 27 years old, a nice BMW 523i se auto.
_________________
1987 classic Range Rover Vogue auto
1998 E39 523i SE auto sedan

A great many models have served me well since the 'sixties, all of them old & some even older than me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.