|
|
| Author |
Message |
traction39

Joined: 19 May 2009 Posts: 399 Location: South Wales
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
clan chieftain

Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 2041 Location: Motherwell
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Common sense HAS prevailed.  _________________ The Clan Chieftain |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JC T ONE
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1139 Location: Denmark
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good to hear
Now we only need to get that EU sheit closed, once & for all.
could be nice to see what happened if there was a vote today about it  _________________ http://www.eurods.eu/wp/index.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1763 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 8:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The agreement means that UK testers will be given greater discretion to assess the roadworthiness of classic cars built after 1960. |
Something like the present MOT then..?
The EU aren't off the hook yet though; I for one have never forgotten the bendy bananas - and don't get me started on enforced metrication  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Penman
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4880 Location: Swindon, Wilts.
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I don't like to explode urban myths, BUT that is what the bendy banana was, started by the UK press, possibly the D Mail or Torygraph.
and the EU didn't require the metrication of shop weights and measures, that was adecision the UK government.
UK had a derogation on that just as they have on certain regulations re- the driving of some vehicle categories.
ie I have grandfather rights on cat D1 with restriction 101(not for hire or reward) but that only applies in the UK.
If I wanted to drive a cat D1 in other EU countries I would have to pass the vocational cat D1 test, even a privately owned minibus requires a vocational licence elsewhere in europe. _________________ Bristols should always come in pairs.
Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baconsdozen

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1119 Location: Under the car.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
welshrover
Joined: 09 Aug 2011 Posts: 326
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| baconsdozen wrote: | Enforced metrication?
I just ignore it.
It will never catch on anyway.
Feet and inches rule! |
too right. millimetres sound foreign to me .  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1763 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Absolutely. I don't know how it is, but young people who have only ever been taught metric at school still think imperial - like it's in their DNA or something. This futility is ironically why enforced metrication has been a bad thing, because pretty much everyone has to convert to real money to understand anything, and it's easy for errors to creep in whilst doing so. If it was a UK government decision then they only got away with it by blaming the EU, and as for the bendy bananas, I read it in the Sun* so it must be right... right?
*I can't believe that I used to buy that rag every day, but in my defence, you couldn't find page 3 girls online back then  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Richard H
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Posts: 2154 Location: Lincolnshire, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I remember doing woodwork at school. There was a man behind a counter who dished out materials and he wouldn't give you anything unless you measured in MM. I remember asking for a 6" length of wood and being told to go away and come back when I'd measured it in metric. I know they are trying to promote modern engineering practices but that really annoyed me for some reason. _________________ Richard Hughes |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mog
Joined: 30 Dec 2007 Posts: 663 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Australia went metric in 1966. I do not have a problem with that, but why, oh why, are they allowed to advertise t.v.'s as 42 inches etc. even to day. How can the young people understand that ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
To get back to the topic. It only ever was a draft document, circulated for consultation. When the consultation resulted in objections, it was revised - democracy in action  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emmerson
Joined: 30 Sep 2008 Posts: 1268 Location: South East Wales
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I needed a piece of skirting board one Sunday morning. Down to a builders merchant I'd not used before."Can I have 42inches of skirting please" "We only sell it by the metre" "Then can I have two metres please, and how much is it?"
Deadpan reply " Thirty bob a foot".
Metric? what's metric? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poodge
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 687
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
"allowed to advertise t.v.'s as 42 inches"
And why,pray tell,is that measurement diagionally across the screen?Seems like false advertising to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
traction39

Joined: 19 May 2009 Posts: 399 Location: South Wales
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I suppose it harks back to the old tubes that were circular. Placing a rectangular/square cover over the front to create a "screen" would represent the diameter in view i.e. corner to corner.
Besides 42" in much smaller than 1066mm and fits on the wall better
NASA knows all about different units...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|