Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
|
Author |
Message |
Nic Jarman

Joined: 05 Oct 2008 Posts: 1031 Location: Stoke by Clare, Suffolk
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:35 am Post subject: Testing brakes |
|
|
Thank you very much to the elderly biddy for testing the brakes on our '36 Morris 8. She turned across us and made me hit the brakes big time. I knew what was happening but my partner was very surprised and narrowly avoided headbutting the windscreen. I have always been scepticle about classic cars and accidents but now I am converted. How the hell can you not see a Morris 8 coming at you? You can not say we are going too fast. _________________ 1936 Morris 8 Series 1
1973 MGB roadster
1977 MG Midget 1500
Dax Rush |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
bluto
Joined: 24 Jan 2011 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Having ridden motorcycles for most of my life I can honestly say ''People don't see fire trucks! Much less any of us''
Good job you we're hurt |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Richard H
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Posts: 2150 Location: Lincolnshire, UK
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I had some old duffer turn out of the doctor's surgery car park right in front of my A35 without looking. Luckily being used to old cars, my foot was hovering over the brake the moment I saw his nose sticking out. I still had to do an 'emergency stop' with the drum brakes locking up and the car screeching to a stop with my hand hard on the horn and ending up about three feet from his Saab. He looked really surprised I was there  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's surprising that whilst they know their cars are faster than ours, they think our brakes are better..... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lemansvk
Joined: 16 Aug 2010 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
bluto wrote: | Having ridden motorcycles for most of my life I can honestly say ''People don't see fire trucks! Much less any of us''
|
I think this gets to the core of it. People drive around with their heads up their ar ... er sorry, I mean in the wrong place. I have saved a couple of lives by full-on stops that cost me rubber but prevented my engine sitting in the drivers right ribcage. Both of them came through "Give way" signs And I was driving medium size car (BMW1800), in good light conditions (full sunshine - in Australia).
I was once rear ended at traffic lights when I had been stopped 30 seconds in a queue of cars - I was in a bright red Sunbeam Alpine - kind of hard to miss on a flat road with a clear view over 500 metres.
Where I live (Canberra, Australia) we have fixed radar speed cameras. These have three LARGE (2 metres wide) warning signs, the first of which is up to 500 metres before you get to the camera. And yet they still catch thousands of drivers every year. Personally, I think that anyone caught in these conditions should automatically lose their licence for 6 months. For driving with their heads up their - er sorry, I mean driving without due care and attention.
If you want my opinion (and you're about to get it) instead of having radar speed cameras we should take licences (and cars) off people who habitually cause smashes.
Rant over,
Cheers, Vic _________________ I started out with nothing... and I still have most of it left. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baconsdozen

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1119 Location: Under the car.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I nearly had a collision with a silly old twerp yesterday.It was in WH Smith the old boy was on one of those ruddy mobility buggies.
Later on I saw he'd had a miracle recovery and was able to walk in a shop his buggy couldn't get into.Pushing and shoving past people ,a task made easier by the size of his gut it struck me that selfishness isn't confined to the road. _________________ Thirty years selling imperial hand tools for old machinery(Now happily retired). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigJohn
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 954 Location: Wem, Shropshire
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First rule of Police Driving, " treat everyone else on the road as someone who wants to kill you", 2nd rule "Look for the softest piece of roadside furniture to hit in evasive action", and the difference between a Traffic Officer and a normal Police driver, Traffic have faster accidents!! 
Last edited by BigJohn on Thu Feb 03, 2011 4:38 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger-hatchy

Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 2135 Location: Tiptree, Essex
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They can't see a 40 ton articulated lorry,
Don't have enough fingers and toe to count how many times I've had the same with 8'6" wide, 13' 4" tall and 50' long, and still can't be seen.
How do you expect them to see a little thing like a car.
Roger |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RobMoore
Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Posts: 105 Location: Peterlee
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2011 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
People are in so much of a rush these days. One of the reason I got rid of my modern for the morris. Now I actually do drive a car
What annoys me now is that people see me and just think Oh an old car = slow car and just pull out in front of me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Nic Jarman

Joined: 05 Oct 2008 Posts: 1031 Location: Stoke by Clare, Suffolk
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lemansvk wrote: | I was once rear ended at traffic lights |
Anyone you knew? _________________ 1936 Morris 8 Series 1
1973 MGB roadster
1977 MG Midget 1500
Dax Rush |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know this is a little off topic but I would be interested in the views of "real" motorists rather than the "armchair to supermarket and back" variety
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2011/02/04/montreal-speeding.html
This is a hefty penalty for not having an accident. Speed causing accidents is something that comes up in the media on a regular basis.
Inappropriate speed, can be as low as 20mph, if it is a busy carpark.
When hard core car thieves are given very little punishment, is the fine and penalty for the above appropriate.
I have, on a handful of occassions in the past, stretched the legs of my Senator in the early dawn light. Choosing stretches of motorway between junctions and service areas and providing the horizon remained clear I would hold it about 145mph for a few minutes.
We had freezing rain here in Winnipeg this morning. I let the streets air a bit before venturing out. As I passed McDonalds drive through there were three vehicles all caught up in a nose to tail shunt in the entrance.
Expensive breakfast eh !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigJohn
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 954 Location: Wem, Shropshire
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well Peter,,,,, without seeing the location it is difficult to give a complete comment, but on the facts given, 3.5 times the speed limit at 3am in an suv into a tunnel (I have been professionally trained to drive at speed and when I retired 15 yrs ago I was a Police Divisional Accident Investigator) I'll give it a go;
3.5 times limit and caught, tough.
3.5 times limit in an suv, stupid
3.5 times limit into a tunnel at 3am, Now then when would it be likely for maintainence/cleaning work in a tunnel? Oh lets do it when there is no traffic, WTF is this coming at the back of our truck at 3.5 times the speed limit...
Get my drift
John. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
FrazzleTC
Joined: 28 Dec 2010 Posts: 146 Location: Dumfries and Galloway
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On the subject of brakes, I had to brake very hard the other day when a woman in a Mondeo pulled out in front of me while I was travelling along a street in a 40 mph limit. It didn't lock up and pulled up very well, but her next move was rather stupid. Whereas you'd have thought if someone had pulled out in front of another car, they'd try to accelerate harder to get out of the way of the car coming towards them. However, this woman just stopped right across my lane! I decided to toot the horn, at which point she made a rude gesture and mouthed off. Wishing to remain above such childishness I ignored this and waited for her to get out of my way before continuing on my way. Surely if you can't see a large yellow car with its lights on, you really shouldn't be driving.
What's just as annoying, is that yesterday evening on my way home, I was coming up to a roundabout at the end of a dual carriageway at a normal speed, and just as I entered the roundabout, a woman in a Corsa decided she was going to try to overtake me on the roundabout, cutting me up in the process, and roaring off. If she'd waited just 2 minutes she could have overtaken me if she'd really wanted to!
Although the penalty for the Canadian motorist's actions may appear harsh, the speeds he was doing were ridiculous given that he was in a tunnel, and in an SUV which weighs over 2 tons. Bit daft really, although I'm sure a great many forum members will have, at some point or other, gone slightly quicker than they're supposed to, when nobody has been looking, though, but driving on an empty motorway is possibly not very different to driving through a tunnel. It's best to avoid driving like that on any road at any time, not just because you might get caught, but also because, we may all think we're great drivers, but what would you do if your car suffered a serious fault at that speed?
Sounds like perhaps the chap has been made an example of, but, if it saves a life, I suppose it's worth it. He's obviously not short of a penny or two if at 20 he can afford an X6! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Roger-hatchy

Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 2135 Location: Tiptree, Essex
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BigJohn wrote: | Well Peter,,,,, without seeing the location it is difficult to give a complete comment, but on the facts given, 3.5 times the speed limit at 3am in an suv into a tunnel (I have been professionally trained to drive at speed and when I retired 15 yrs ago I was a Police Divisional Accident Investigator) I'll give it a go;
3.5 times limit and caught, tough.
3.5 times limit in an suv, stupid
3.5 times limit into a tunnel at 3am, Now then when would it be likely for maintainence/cleaning work in a tunnel? Oh lets do it when there is no traffic, WTF is this coming at the back of our truck at 3.5 times the speed limit...
Get my drift
John. |
I can imagine the reply if there had been a fatal accident of a maintance worker.
With somone like that it would be WTF was that idiot doing in MY way. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RobMoore
Joined: 16 Jan 2011 Posts: 105 Location: Peterlee
|
Posted: Fri Feb 04, 2011 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Deserved fine tbqh.
There is driving at speed then there is driving at speed well, I have done both in the past and learnt the hard way.
Whilst we all assume we are very good drivers, myself included, one can never account for the unexpected idiot that will sooner or late appear from nowhere.
I really can't understand why vehicles are not limited. the max speed you are permitted to do in the UK is 70 period. What is the point in having the ability to go 170?
Speeding kills be it on motorway or back street. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
php BB powered © php BB Grp.
|