Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
|
Author |
Message |
kevin2306
Joined: 01 Jul 2013 Posts: 1359 Location: nr Llangollen, north wales
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 5:54 pm Post subject: Adding additives |
|
|
At a classic show today, one group of MG enthusiasts were raving about the effects of this product:
http://www.millersoils.co.uk/automotive/tds-automotive.asp?prodsegmentID=911§or=Classics
Upto now, apart from using 99ron fuel, I havnt done anything else in the way of fuel additives etc.
Looking at the reduction of the methanol effects alone make it slightly attractive, so, snake oil or of benefit to the classic car scene?
Kev |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7213 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
About 15 years ago on a hot day after a long run I left my car for half hour and when I come back to it its SU pump just couldn't catch a breath of liquid fuel until a further cooling period but I can't say I've noticed any vapourisation type issues in recent times just running on ordinary 95 octane unleaded.
With only a 7.3:1 compression ratio detonation has never been a problem, leastwise not that I've ever noticed.
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
goneps
Joined: 18 Jun 2013 Posts: 601 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Ethanol protection" is fair enough, but pre-war engines do not need an octane boost. On the contrary, the fuels they were designed for were probably in the region of 60 octane (at a guess), and lead additives only became a common feature during the war (which is not to suggest that lead does not prolong time between overhaul).
In the early fifties, when the Korean war was on, only 72 octane "pool" petrol was available in Britain, and most engines ran well enough on that.
Some in Morris circles have been experimenting with adding 5% kerosene (heating oil, if you're fortunate to have access to it) to ameliorate the hot, dry burn and rapid flame front of modern unleaded fuels.
The logical conclusion is that putting anything higher than the lowest available octane in the tank of a pre-war British car is simply wasting money and probably doing more harm than good.
Richard |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jddevel
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 25 Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:55 am Post subject: Additives |
|
|
I have read elsewhere that in that in early classics that it is believed that the metal work has over the years of use, absorbed sufficient lead for additives to be unnecessary. Anyone have a view here> |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kevin2306
Joined: 01 Jul 2013 Posts: 1359 Location: nr Llangollen, north wales
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
im specifically looking at the ethanol protection useage
Kev |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ka

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 600 Location: Orkney.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
It will be interesting to read the feedback from other forum members, but I am beginning to wonder if the hype was worse than the effect.
It seems that removing lead from fuel has had little or no effect, certanly for the average historic vehicle owner, and I wonder if the addition of ethanol in fuel at the current rates is the same.
I have read the stories of fuel pipes breaking down, fuel floats in carbs becoming porous, petrol going 'off' when stored, but on a personal level, none of my classic British motorcycles seem to be suffering, neither does the car, but that is on an SU, and I have lined the fuel tank (it was leaking through the soldered joints, and is 68 years old) and replaced the fuel lines upon rebuild, so over to you......... _________________ KA
Better three than four. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I edit my club's magazine. I haven't received a single report of a problem caused by ethanol - there has been complete silence since I ran a feature about the 'risks' so at the moment, in the absence of any evidence, the threat seems unfounded.
As for fuel going off; my Riley sat in its garage for five months with half a tank of Tesco unleaded. It ran perfectly on it when I started it at the beginning of April. _________________ David
1963 Riley 1.5
1965 Riley 1.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rick Site Admin

Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 22782 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
P3steve
Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 542 Location: Great Yarmouth, Norfolk
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rick wrote: | As for fuel "going off", for me it seems to vary from engine to engine. The Dodge truck fires up on 6 month old fuel without problem, while our modern petrol mower refuses to start in the spring unless I drain out the previous year's fuel first.
RJ |
Could be a volume problem maybe a larger amount can hold its properties better than the small tank on the mower,
as to mine I was in hospital last year for about five months and didn't run the Rover for near on eight months and when the battery was charged it did start after a few turns. I don't as a rule use any additives and last year did a decoke with new exhaust valves and had a good look at the valves seats and could see no signs of seat regression or wear and the new valves ground in very quickly. _________________ If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JohnDale

Joined: 19 Mar 2008 Posts: 790 Location: Kelvin Valley,Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
If, as part of your planned maintenance, you check valve clearances,you will soon be aware of any valve seat recession, as it closes up the clearances.
Anyway,didn't the government spokesman say the other day that the recession was over??? Cheers,JD. _________________ 1958 Ford Zephyr Mk2 Convertible
1976 Ford Granada Ghia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1763 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JohnDale wrote: |
Anyway,didn't the government spokesman say the other day that the recession was over??? Cheers,JD. |
You don't believe what those #@!&#$*% say do you JD? Maybe the recession is over for rich people in London, but a lot of the country hasn't recovered from Thatcher yet  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alanb
Joined: 10 Sep 2012 Posts: 517 Location: Berkshire.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ethanol(alcohol) was widely used 50s & 60s, by Clevland , BP , National benzol & other up to 20% it never harmed the cars then, _________________ old tourer
Morris 8 two seater |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jddevel
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 25 Location: Cornwall
|
Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:46 am Post subject: Additives |
|
|
I agree Bitumen Boy and my age I`m cynical about everything-especially corporations and politicians. However I seem to remember my remark was made via the Rolls club but wouldn`t guarantee it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lowdrag
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 1600 Location: Le Mans
|
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2014 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A friend fired up his MGB the other day after a two year break due to a new hip and other health complications. The fuel was still fine, which rather surprised me, and he tells me he uses 95 octane with not much else. The car, as you can see, doesn't and never has done much mileage for the last ten years though. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rdover
Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's the first reported problem with ethanol then ...
Last night I tried to sort the weeping brass fuel valve on my 1912 by polishing the parts assuming it had been damaged.. It was fine when new but over a few years (and less than 500 miles) it just leaked.
Talking to the supplier today, he told me it had been damaged by ethanol and this is backed up by The Federation of British Historic Vehicle Clubs' research. _________________ Richard |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
php BB powered © php BB Grp.
|