classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

If only they had ...
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat
Author Message
Rick
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 22784
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 10:58 am    Post subject: If only they had ... Reply with quote

What small, cheap, easy-to-implement difference to how a car was designed and/or built, would have transformed the survival rate for that type of car years down the line? Or made them a whole lot easier to live with in their old age?

I'm thinking along the lines of early Mini floors, and how they were welded at the factory, that kind of thing.

RJ
_________________
Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bitumen Boy



Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 1763
Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 11:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having wrestled with the rear suspension on my Herald enough times to know the job pretty much inside out, I can't help feeling that a straightforward live axle would have been a better choice. Probably cheaper to manufacture and definitely easier to live with than than the swing axle setup - if ST wanted to brag about the Herald having IRS they should have spent the money to do it properly or not bothered at all. It's interesting to note that the Indian-built Heralds evolved a live axle after a few years, eventually they became very different cars to suit local conditions.

Another one that comes to mind is the master cylinders on Minis - surely they could have been made easier to remove?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith D



Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 1165
Location: Upper Swan, Western Australia

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A longer spline on Mini drive shafts to allow the universals to be replaced without disconnecting the upper ball joint. Some people reckon you can do this, but I've never had one with a long enough spline.

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BigJohn



Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 954
Location: Wem, Shropshire

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Going to be controversial here and maybe upset a fewRover P6 owners. P6 front suspension, change the crazy bell crank system, and at the rear, make the brakes outbound for easy servicing, and change the mad calipers for conventional 2 pot. My P6b was a cow to do rear brake work on. The suspension on the P6 has it rolling like a drunken sow riding a tandem with flat tyres, OK it stayed on the road, but what a handful.
In Fact change the lot into a Triumph 2.5, beef up the back springs, and throw the V8 in.
P6b Sorted. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
emmerson



Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 1268
Location: South East Wales

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A Range Rover Classic without built in water and mud traps would have been good. And a heater motor you could access without a ten hour dash removal, and .......................................etc!
But I still love it to bits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Peter_L



Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 2680
Location: New Brunswick. Canada.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:53 pm    Post subject: Re: If only they had ... Reply with quote

Rick wrote:
What small, cheap, easy-to-implement difference to how a car was designed and/or built, would have transformed the survival rate for that type of car years down the line? Or made them a whole lot easier to live with in their old age?

I'm thinking along the lines of early Mini floors, and how they were welded at the factory, that kind of thing.

RJ


A design fault which put the upward fold on the floor pan outside of the side panels, water poured in. We have family who worked at BMC drawing office back then. Because of deadline and budget it was a corporate decision to use the stock panels and not delay the launch while they waited for re tooling. Somewhere in the distant past I think the total of cars made this way was published. May be it will turn up on the interwebby.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Peter_L



Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 2680
Location: New Brunswick. Canada.

PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2015 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Had BMC spent a bit more money on their engine for the Mini, the idler gear, that troubled the more powerful 1100/1300 cc engines could have been avoided.

Why did Ford and others insist on putting the engine to chassis earth strap under the car ?

and... who the heck at Ford designed the V6 engine I had in my Explorer. They must have stayed up late for many nights just finding ways that required almost every routine, except changing the oil, to involve removing the engine.

The factory fitted the engine, suspension transmission from below and if one had the equipment it was hours easier to get it out that way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
emmerson



Joined: 30 Sep 2008
Posts: 1268
Location: South East Wales

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another one that annoys on almost all cars - why don't "they" make the washers start before the wipers, thereby avoiding the wipers scraping across the dry screen?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7214
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

peterwpg wrote:

Why did Ford and others insist on putting the engine to chassis earth strap under the car ?


I've never understood in cars where the battery is mounted in the engine compartment that the battery earth was not connected directly to the engine rather than via the chassis. (I'm not saying that there shouldn't be an earth strap between engine and chassis, just that the starter motor current doesn't need to pass through the chassis.)
_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
goneps



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 601
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

emmerson wrote:
Another one that annoys on almost all cars - why don't "they" make the washers start before the wipers, thereby avoiding the wipers scraping across the dry screen?

They do on my 2001 Corolla, and on the 1994 Nissan that preceded it.

My gripe is with spin-on oil filters that always seem to be orientated so as to make the biggest possible mess when changing them, regardless of how much care is taken.

Oh, and another pet hate is single-piston disc brake callipers. On the Herald and Vitesse, which had twin-piston callipers, pads could be changed in a couple of minutes. Now the calliper has to be removed and worked on while trying not to wreck the flexible hydraulic hose, and I'm sure they're more susceptible to dragging on the discs.

Richard
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7107
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 12:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seeing how Austin had the Seven in production for so many years one would have thought they could have got to grips with the braking system (no pun intended). Admittedly an attempt was made to improve things when they coupled the front and rear brakes but this could have been so much better if they had included a compensator. Without such a device, the front and back brake cables have to be adjusted to come on all at the same time.

For those unaware of short wheelbase A7 brake adjustment, due to the twist in the brake cross shaft brackets the near side rear has to be given a slight lead over the off side. To add to the nightmare a slight lead of the front brakes over the rear is required because the front axle has a tendency to rotate with braking load - the long radius arms also bend - effectively extending the front cable travel. Remember; they all need to come on at the same time so if you have reasonable braking at speed, the rear brakes can lock up at slow speed. The drums were also made of pressed steel instead of cast iron but it is now possible to change them.

On a positive point, all these difficulties are a challenge for the Austin 7 owners to debate and tackle. Without them life would probably be less interesting...or frightening. Shocked
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ka



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 600
Location: Orkney.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Being able to replace the Ford Pinto cam from the front, instead of either a head or engine removal, although I have to admit, the work from these replacements kept the kids fed for years through the 80's.
_________________
KA

Better three than four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7214
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having recently restored a Wolseley 6/80 engine from being totally filled with water and seized I think the designer should have given more consideration to recovery from the seized condition! Laughing

1. With all the pistons seized in their bores you need to be able to disconnect their con rods from the crank otherwise you are fighting all six at once but with angled big end caps it is impossible to get a socket spanner onto some of the retaining bolts that are well inside the crankcase.

2. With an overhead camshaft whose bearings are attached to the cylinder head by arches cast into the head and cannot be split you need to remove the camshaft longitudinally which means that you need special tools that compress all twelve valves simultaneously. This of course is made more difficult when most of the twelve are seized in their guides. It would have been so much easier if the cam bearing retainers could be split.

3. It would have made setting the ignition timing very much easier if the timing marks had been on the crankshaft pulley rather than on the flywheel given that you want to see the marks whilst rotating the crank into position.

Peter Rolling Eyes
_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
lowdrag



Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 1600
Location: Le Mans

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two words. Rust proofing. I'll never forget going to Roger Clark's garage at Narborough one day to look at a new Alfa GTV. The headlamp reflector was already brown with rust.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baconsdozen



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 1119
Location: Under the car.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lowdrag wrote:
Two words. Rust proofing. I'll never forget going to Roger Clark's garage at Narborough one day to look at a new Alfa GTV. The headlamp reflector was already brown with rust.

Applies to other cars too,the Cresta,victor and 1100 series among others all rusted before they made it to their first owners garage.
Manual jaguars where the clutch could only be replaced after the whole engine and box were removed (which on some meant dropping the front suspension) sent a great many to the scrapyard when they still had a few years left in them.I seem to recall the MGB series required similar overkill in the dismantling stakes.
_________________
Thirty years selling imperial hand tools for old machinery(Now happily retired).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.