|
|
| Author |
Message |
47p2

Joined: 24 Nov 2007 Posts: 2009 Location: Glasgow
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 12:28 pm Post subject: Turn on a sixpence |
|
|
 _________________ ROVER
One of Britain's Fine Cars |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7219 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Could be good for emergency stops too!
Peter  _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rick Site Admin

Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 22828 Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
goneps
Joined: 18 Jun 2013 Posts: 601 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2016 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Almost as good as a Triumph Herald! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Must be front wheel drive. _________________ David
1963 Riley 1.5
1965 Riley 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
baconsdozen

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1119 Location: Under the car.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fluffle-Valve

Joined: 30 Dec 2009 Posts: 521 Location: At my computer in a bungalow in Duston, Northampton.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| baconsdozen wrote: | | Where does the back seat passenger come from?. He suddenly pops up from nowhere. |
He walks up and gets in. It's just the film jumping. _________________
Series 3 1972 LWB Truck Cab Pick Up. My daily drive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7219 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| riley541 wrote: | | Must be front wheel drive. |
I don't think so! I suspect they just independently brake one wheel at the rear.
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kenham
Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 209 Location: Kent
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| One rear wheel is going in the opposite direction to the other, can't see how that can work if it is driving. As the passenger suddenly appears from nowhere the wheels turn, driver just sitting there doing nothing, looks a bit strange to me, don't think it will catch on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| peter scott wrote: | | riley541 wrote: | | Must be front wheel drive. |
I don't think so! I suspect they just independently brake one wheel at the rear.
Peter |
Complete brain fade on my part, front wheel drive in that would be the engineering marvel of the age! _________________ David
1963 Riley 1.5
1965 Riley 1.5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
On another piece of film, via my previous link,
http://citroenvie.com/was-citroen-first-with-parking-assistance-back-in-1927/
it looks as if the driver reaches down inside the car. Perhaps he could apply the brake to either the left or right rear wheels. This would determine which wheel turned and set the direction of travel (clock or anti) clock. Driving on the Right Rear would tend to push the car anti clockwise.
There is some debate on the web, as to the make. Citroen or Peugeot.
Also via the same link, a close up of the front wheels as they turn through 90 degrees. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rick Site Admin

Joined: 27 Apr 2005 Posts: 22828 Location: UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it is a Citroen, would need to see a Peugeot to compare. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
goneps
Joined: 18 Jun 2013 Posts: 601 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How the tie rods were extended remains a mystery, but I'd guess the drive was logical enough. With the front wheels almost at right angles there would be considerable resistance to forward or backward motion, therefore as the crown wheel tried to turn the only motion possible for the differential gears would be to force the half shaft gears to turn in opposite directions. One side would have to turn more than the other, otherwise the crown wheel would not move at all.
Turning in the opposite direction could be accomplished by using reverse instead of first. I think the key to this is that the front wheels turn through less than 90°, thus allowing slight initial motion to get things moving.
Extremely stressful on the diff., though, as someone's already remarked—and presumably a lot of clutch slipping as well.
Richard |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|