classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

Purchase Tax 1953
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat
Author Message
nascar24



Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 26
Location: Sunny Newton Abbot!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 7:17 pm    Post subject: Purchase Tax 1953 Reply with quote

What was the rate of purchase tax on new cars and light commercial vehicles in 1953 in the UK and did the vehicle's cubic capacity make a difference?
Also how did that affect vans fitted with side windows?


Alan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
bjacko



Joined: 28 Oct 2013
Posts: 362
Location: Melbourne Australia

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 12:49 pm    Post subject: Purchase Tax 1953 Reply with quote

Not sure about the purchase tax but if you fitted windows to a van it was classed as a car and cost more than if it had no windows for registration etc.
_________________
1938 Morris 8 Ser II Coupe Utility (Pickup)
1985 Rover SD1 VDP
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 1954
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchase_Tax#:~:text=The%2033.33%25%20rate%20was%20increased,it%20was%20reduced%20to%2050%25.


According to the above, in 1953 the PT rate on cars was reduced to 50%.

Prior to 1951 the rates were two tiered...based on the purchase price. [66%]

The higher rate was extended to all cars after 1951.

Vans [commercial vehicles] were exempt from Purchase tax.
However, I believe......once the van was 2 years old, side windows could be fitted, and purchase tax was avoided. Prior to the cut-off date, PT would be charged retrospectively.

[I could be wrong, it could be 1 year??}

This rule probably led to the eventual demise of the motorcycle combination?
IE, with the advent of the BMC Minivan?
_________________
Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 1954
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
did the vehicle's cubic capacity make a difference?



Reference the above? Engine capacities bore no relation to purchase tax, but were used indirectly to calculate the equivalent to vehicle excise duty....a tax payable annually in order to use the vehicle on the public highway.

This was known colloquially as the ''horsepower tax'...and was calculated using the RAC horsepower equation.

This essentially was a calculation based on the surface area of a piston.
''Horsepower'' was used by many countries as a calculator for road taxation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_horsepower#:~:text=It%20is%20an%20administrative%20unit,name%20for%20the%20longest%20time.

In some countries this lead to a stifling of engine efficiency development....For example, in the UK, the tax meant sidevalve engines became the rule, as OHV engines needed larger diameter pistons.
_________________
Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nascar24



Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 26
Location: Sunny Newton Abbot!

PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2023 7:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Purchase Tax 1953 Reply with quote

bjacko wrote:
Not sure about the purchase tax but if you fitted windows to a van it was classed as a car and cost more than if it had no windows for registration etc.

Thanks,
Jowett made some prototype cars in the early fifties called the CD Bradford. One was a pick up, designed and body built by Briggs Dagenham. It was a two seater and because it had quarter lights behind the doors would have been taxed as a car! As far as i can see there were no other pick ups for sale then with extra side windows.
Ford Australia built a few using the same roof pressing with identical windows and i dont think they were produced or were they?

Alan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
47p2



Joined: 24 Nov 2007
Posts: 2009
Location: Glasgow

PostPosted: Tue Oct 10, 2023 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've no idea of Purchase Tax costs in 1953 but here is a 1946 Rover brochure with separate Purchase Tax prices included and price increases hand written

https://www.flickr.com/photos/195821567@N04/sets/72177720299665824/with/52134159445
_________________
ROVER
One of Britain's Fine Cars
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.