classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

MGB Chrome bumper conversion.??
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Bodywork & Paint Restoration
Author Message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7273
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2025 10:29 pm    Post subject: MGB Chrome bumper conversion.?? Reply with quote

I would like to test the forum's opinion on something that has been at the back of my mind for (literally) years.

Ever since MG at Abingdon tried to update the ubiquitous MGB by fitting large black rubber bumpers there have been people who, like me, have hated them... and retro fitted chrome bumpers. Fortunately the parts are all available.

The conversion, while not a simple 'swap over', is a pretty simple job for the home mechanic and from what I can gather quite a profitable one too!

In this new world where originality seems to be the overriding motive for classic car ownership, I am just wondering how such a conversion would be received.?

What do you guys think?
.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 2144
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Mon Dec 22, 2025 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I recall, the rubber bumpers were installed to meet US safety regulations...the US being the target marketplace.

Whilst they may not do much for the retro appearance, they might prove slightly more aerodynamic, perhaps?

Also, the ride height of the whole car was raised, by, I believe, altering the chassis legs to give a raised spring height.

If rubber bumpers are deemed so abhorrent [I am OK with them, BTW}...there is a kit on the market to fit a smoother front end and neater rear end to the bodyshell. Bumpers disposed of. Something akin to the ''Sebring'' look?

Being a bit of a classic trials enthusiast myself, a late rubber bumper MGB is a better starting point to make them bullet proof on rough terrain...the suspension already being party raised.

Whilst neither an MGB nor a Spridget, modified to survive trialing, is going to be 'pretty,'...the Spridget driver being able to look down upon ordinary Spridget drivers....it all depends on whether one appreciates 'form ,' over 'function?'

Nowadays I would struggle to get in or out of a B..never mind a Spridget...although a rubber bumper car, being ever so slightly higher, may prove marginally less of a struggle?

In any event, my view would be, a rubber bumper MGB GT looks one heck of a sight better than anything made in the past 10 years or so....without exception, and regardless of purchase price.
_________________
Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rusty



Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 290
Location: Bunbury, Western Australia

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2025 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recon, that as "almost" everyone thinks like me that the rubber bumper series is a retrograde vandalism of a "really good" design, and if someone wanted to "retro fit" the earlier look I doubt you would get many objecting. It would maybe lower the value, not because anyone thought particularly bad about it, but as you say it's just "not original"!

Whether it is "legal" or not to remove and replace them with the earlier "look", may depend on your licencing authorities, like has been said, it was reluctantly put on in the first place to meet US requirements and its removal may be a bit "problematic"! I do know that out here in Aus, it would be a definite no-no if you wanted to put it on a concessional licence, but for a full licence I "don't know" one way or the other!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7273
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2025 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To be honest, I can't stand the sight of the rubber bumper cars ...and would only consider buying one as a chrome bumper conversion project...but as one sage put it "why not buy a chrome bumper car in the first place"?

I am not sure I would change the ride height; although I think it does make the cars look faintly ridiculous.

The bumperless cars that are about are also ugly to my eyes, but that goes for almost any such conversions be it a VW beetle or bus to an Arnolt Bristol.

While I realise MG were trying to extend the life of what was becoming something of a dinosaur as they struggled with the reality that the traditional 2 seater sports car was already a thing of the past, I cannot help feeling that they got it wrong.

If, on the other hand, the bumpers had evolved as a colour coordinated and integrated part of the car, they would have modernised the old B in a way that would have been far more acceptable both then and now.

After all; look how successful the Mazda MX5 has been. Now there's a nice looking car.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
ukdave2002



Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 4285
Location: South Cheshire

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2025 6:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Back in the early 80's when I was a student, a neighbour had a 1966 MG Midget. One icy morning she failed to stop and went into the back of a Volvo.

Although the damage was limited to panels and bumper, as it was a 15 year old car the insurance company wrote it off, she had the opportunity to buy the car off them for £25. She didn't want it but knowing that I tinkered with cars she asked if I wanted it.

I considered it, and thought that as it required a front bumper and grill, I could repair it and at the same time "upgrade" it by fitting the modern rubber bumpers ! Embarassed Embarassed ..The recklessness of youth! Rolling Eyes

In the end my parents scuppered the plan as I already had a Bedford CA (my daily transport) and a Simca 1301 that I was fixing up!, apparently I would make the place look like the local scrap yard!

I image if I had done the rubber bumper conversion and kept the car , it would have been converted back to chrome at some point in the future when I came to my senses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7273
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2025 9:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good one Dave!

This MGB with under 8000 miles from new sold yesterday for only 4,750 K. If it had been a chrome bumper car my guess is that it would have sold for considerably more.!!


(BTW I absolutely loved the Simca. If they still sold them I would have one. Brilliant cars. Wink)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MikeEdwards



Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2740
Location: South Cheshire

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2025 10:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ukdave2002 wrote:
I considered it, and thought that as it required a front bumper and grill, I could repair it and at the same time "upgrade" it by fitting the modern rubber bumpers ! Embarassed Embarassed ..The recklessness of youth! Rolling Eyes


It wasn't just you - at one point there were quite a few Porsche 911s that had been modified to fit the more modern impact bumpers, I went to look at one that had all that stuff from a much newer car, but still had the non-galvanised bodyshell underneath it. These days, like MGBs, there's a lot of money in backdating later 911s to look like old ones.

A mate of mine has an MGB that's had chrome bumpers retro fitted, I doubt the casual onlooker will be able to tell the difference, while anyone who knows MGs will see either the ride height, or the registration year.
_________________
1976 Vauxhall HP Firenza, 1976 Vauxhall Sportshatch (x2), 1986 Audi coupe quattro, 2000 Audi TT
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rick
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 22829
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Dec 23, 2025 10:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's an MGB locally that is used all year around, going from the reg. it started out as a rubber bumper car but has been converted to chrome. That part of the mod looks fine, although the ride height is still rubber-bumper-spec which looks a little odd to say the least.

Interestingly(!) I did the engine mounts on my rubber-bumper B and it was a bit of a pain, it involved dropping the steering rack. Yet to do the job on dad's chrome-bumper B was a doddle, for some reason the design was altered for later cars. So another vote for getting a chrome bumper car from the outset, plus I think the dash and interior are nicer on the earlier cars.

RJ
_________________
Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Bodywork & Paint Restoration All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.