|
|
| Author |
Message |
Crash one
Joined: 07 Mar 2014 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2014 8:18 pm Post subject: Fuel gauge question |
|
|
Greetings guys. First post on here so if I seem dumb, give me a break.
I am looking for a fuel gauge, however the use I wish to put it to is to build an angle of attack indicator for an aircraft. This requires the sender unit to be fitted with a wind vane instead of the float. The sender swinging arm thing only needs to move through ~ 20 degrees from "full to empty". As the aircraft nose is pulled up the vane should remain horizontal reading something other than straight & level until the thing stalls.
The problem is which type of gauge should I look for? They seem to be of two types, the slow moving thing in my Subaru takes about 10mins to reach full if I fill the tank, and then stay wherever it is when the ign is switched off. The other type moves instantly relative to the sender, which is what I need. Someone once mentioned what each type was called but I've forgot.
Just for the record, the aircraft is a classic, built France 1959 so should qualify?
Second question: what fluid can I use in Landrover master cylinders other than hygroscopic Dot 3/4 paint destroying brake fluid, because I can't taxi to the left cos it's all seized up! I was hoping TQF stuff might work but I don't want to wreck the seals finding out.
Help please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7219 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2014 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi CO,
The modern ones are all slow acting. You need one that is probably older than about mid 1950s.
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
roverdriver

Joined: 18 Oct 2008 Posts: 1210 Location: 100 miles from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
You will find that the slow acting effect is sometimes created by behind-the-dash electronics endeavouring to iron out the fluctuations sent by a quicker acting sender. You might consider this in your hunt.
I rather agree with Peter, though, that older is more likely to give you what you are looking for. _________________ Dane- roverdriver but not a Viking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crash one
Joined: 07 Mar 2014 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks guys , there are a few vintage shows in the Spring up here, I'll have a look. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEdwards
Joined: 25 May 2011 Posts: 2744 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| peter scott wrote: | Hi CO,
The modern ones are all slow acting. You need one that is probably older than about mid 1950s.
Peter |
That's not the case entirely - my modern (well, 2000, it's still modern to me) Audi has a fuel gauge that operates instantly, but it's different apparently to something like an old 911 gauge which is similarly fast-acting.
As I understand it there are two basic types:
Bimetallic strip - this has two pieces of different metal fixed together, heating them up (via the current coming from the sender unit) causes them to expand at different rates, leading to the curve which then moves the pointer on the gauge. These act quite slowly because expansion and contraction takes place gradually.
Magnetic thing - the current from the sender unit is applied to magnets which cause the pointer to move proportionally to the current (or voltage, I forget). These act much more quickly, but are susceptible to 'bounce' as there's nothing smoothing the action out. A mate of mine had a late 60s 911 that had gauges like this.
Modern cars sometimes use stepper motors to position the pointer, so the sensor input goes to the computer which then knows how many times to 'fire' the stepper to get the pointer to the correct place. This can be useful as the computer will know the shape of the petrol tank and can take into account irregular shapes which a float-type sensor cannot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crash one
Joined: 07 Mar 2014 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That's the bit I had forgotten, bimetallic strip. So connecting 12 volts across the gauge should instantly, or not, read full? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mid
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 136 Location: Northampton
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Penman
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4880 Location: Swindon, Wilts.
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
I thought that, as well as the types described by Mike E, there are some where the swinging arm moves a contact along a variable resistance coil. _________________ Bristols should always come in pairs.
Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEdwards
Joined: 25 May 2011 Posts: 2744 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Crash one wrote: | | That's the bit I had forgotten, bimetallic strip. So connecting 12 volts across the gauge should instantly, or not, read full? |
That's correct, but the bimetallic strip is the slow-acting one, it needs time for the two different metals to expand to provide the bending action. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crash one
Joined: 07 Mar 2014 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I should have said that. The bimetallic one I don't need. So connecting a battery across the gauge it should move instantly to full? In which case is is not a bimetal type.
Then if I move the soldered connection on the coil to shorten it it should go from empty to full with less movement of the lever arm? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
goneps
Joined: 18 Jun 2013 Posts: 601 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Here's a novel idea. Why not contact a supplier to the home-built aviation market and get a genuine a-of-a indicator. Might save you an awful lot of grief and messing about with parts never designed for the job. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEdwards
Joined: 25 May 2011 Posts: 2744 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is that of course - I'm not sure whether adapting stuff is safe. I do it with the car (not so much now I'm obsessed with originality) but if that goes wrong, I just coast to the side of the road and have to fix it.
I can't tell you about moving the connections internally Crash One, I've never had them in pieces. Visually I prefer the fast-acting ones as there's something nice about the dash gauges jumping into action when I turn on the ignition.
Won't you need a gauge that reads in the centre when horizontal and can move in either direction, or is that not what 'angle of attack' is? I'm imagining it's the 'level' of the aircraft, and it might be pointing up or down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Crash one
Joined: 07 Mar 2014 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
An angle of attack indicator designed for light aircraft is first non existant and if it was it would cost thousands£. It has often been mentioned that it would be useful but far too expensive. It is also not life critical either.
Up/Down , no not required it is the angle wing is at relative to the wing "up".
Sorry to bother you people. It is just an idea. Pre 60s, non bimetal will do.
Thank you gents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEdwards
Joined: 25 May 2011 Posts: 2744 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No problem, always interesting to hear what people are doing. Feel free to stick some more information in the 'aviation' section further down the forum (if you haven't already, I wrote this before I looked). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|