|
Author |
Message |
colwyn500
Joined: 21 Oct 2012 Posts: 1745 Location: Nairn, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2015 11:17 pm Post subject: What's in Lead Substitute Additive? |
|
|
Yesterday, when struggling to remove the "grandad-proof" cap on the expensive stuff I stick in the petrol tank on each fill, I ended up covered in the liquid.
It looks, feels and really smells like red diesel. Rhetorical question, "Am I being conned?"
More to the point, what is actually in lead replacement additive and how does it work? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Peter_L
Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 2680 Location: New Brunswick. Canada.
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 12:06 am Post subject: Re: What's in Lead Substitute Additive? |
|
|
colwyn500 wrote: | Yesterday, when struggling to remove the "grandad-proof" cap on the expensive stuff I stick in the petrol tank on each fill, I ended up covered in the liquid.
It looks, feels and really smells like red diesel. Rhetorical question, "Am I being conned?"
More to the point, what is actually in lead replacement additive and how does it work? |
You should have given it a 5 year old, they can get the tops of much better than me. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mog
Joined: 30 Dec 2007 Posts: 663 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I only used to put additive in my 6 cly. Ford if I was going on a longer trip, say 100 miles or more. Just driving around locally, it never got that hot/warm. I was told you could put automatic oil [fluid ] in for the same effect. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dipster
Joined: 06 Jan 2015 Posts: 408 Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 8:35 am Post subject: Re: What's in Lead Substitute Additive? |
|
|
colwyn500 wrote: | Yesterday, when struggling to remove the "grandad-proof" cap on the expensive stuff I stick in the petrol tank on each fill, I ended up covered in the liquid.
It looks, feels and really smells like red diesel. Rhetorical question, "Am I being conned?"
More to the point, what is actually in lead replacement additive and how does it work? |
Who remembers "shots" of Redex? If I recall that was promoted as an "upper cylinder lubricant". Same stuff perchance? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1763 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it probably is a con. I used one of the main brands of lead replacement additive, endorsed by the FBHVC, for years without problems, but then problems developed lower down in the engine and it was rebuild time. Now the car could still move about under its own power - only just - so to avoid having it "blocking" the garage for ages I found a spare engine in the next valley, and set about rebuilding that. Once I'd paid out for the rebore, regrind, pistons, bearings, gaskets etc there wasn't any spare cash for the top end. Now the valves were pretty bad, but they were just recoverable, with a bit of effort, so the head was reassembled, and the valves tested with paraffin before fitting back on to the engine. In my innocence I thought it would be fine if I just kept using the lead replacement additive... 4k miles later and I was removing the head again to be converted due to bad valves and seats. Essentially it seems that lead replacement additives "work" so long as the valves aren't disturbed, but as soon as the work hardened layer on old valves and seats is removed you might as well not bother. This does of course suggest that additives are useless under any circumstances, and I certainly wouldn't bother with another car - just accept that the head may need work at some future point. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ka

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 600 Location: Orkney.
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2015 6:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
These are the advertised contents, but different manufacturers use different contents,
Methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT)
Ferrocene
Iron pentacarbonyl
Toluene
Trimethylpentane (isooctane) _________________ KA
Better three than four. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mog
Joined: 30 Dec 2007 Posts: 663 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
My older brother worked for Shell for many years. He said that the Shell "boffins " thought that shots of Redex was a waste of time, as they just got burnt up. Before they got to the cylinder walls. But wait a minute , what a bout a two stroke petrol engine ? The oil does get to the cylinder walls... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dipster
Joined: 06 Jan 2015 Posts: 408 Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
As Shell did not manufacture Redex I can easily imagine why they might discount any worth it might have. I just saw it as an extra income at the pump! And the dispenser "gun" as just something else to keep clean. They were always slightly oily and thus attracted forecourt dust.
I have no idea whether Redex actually worked. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7214 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2015 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mog wrote: | My older brother worked for Shell for many years. He said that the Shell "boffins " thought that shots of Redex was a waste of time, as they just got burnt up. Before they got to the cylinder walls. But wait a minute , what a bout a two stroke petrol engine ? The oil does get to the cylinder walls... |
I can't say I'm convinced that Redex is useful but in a four stroke engine the induction stroke will let any Redex contact the cylinder walls before it gets burnt.
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mog
Joined: 30 Dec 2007 Posts: 663 Location: Sydney
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
My brother and Shell were always ready to knock any other petrol / oil company. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ka

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 600 Location: Orkney.
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Two strokes induct via the crankcase, so the oil content in the pre-mix solution would coat the cylinder sides and big/little ends. Later oil injected two strokes fed the main bearing and was 'washed' off by the fuel/air mixture to provide lubrication to little end and cylinder sides before transfer to combustion chamber then the big bang. _________________ KA
Better three than four. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
goneps
Joined: 18 Jun 2013 Posts: 601 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
In other words, two-strokes were lubricated by a 20:1 mixture of petroil and luck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MikeEdwards
Joined: 25 May 2011 Posts: 2704 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've got some "additive" but I rarely use it. I've been of the opinion that I don't do much mileage, little of it is on long motorway runs, at the limit my engine is turning over at around 3200rpm so not exactly 'fast', and I seem to have got away with it for about 15 years so far. Keeping in mind that the part of the head that will erode is the part that would be replaced if I were to have it "converted", I figured I'd have that done after it's eroded and I can't adjust the tappets any more, not just in case it does.
I should clarify I'm not claiming any specialist knowledge there, but I have been pleased to hear that people I think do have such knowledge seem to have the same thought. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7106 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
MikeEdwards wrote: | I've got some "additive" but I rarely use it. I've been of the opinion that I don't do much mileage, little of it is on long motorway runs, at the limit my engine is turning over at around 3200rpm so not exactly 'fast', and I seem to have got away with it for about 15 years so far. Keeping in mind that the part of the head that will erode is the part that would be replaced if I were to have it "converted", I figured I'd have that done after it's eroded and I can't adjust the tappets any more, not just in case it does.
I should clarify I'm not claiming any specialist knowledge there, but I have been pleased to hear that people I think do have such knowledge seem to have the same thought. |
I am in complete agreement. Many people will have had hardened valve seats fitted regardless of mileage because they have been frightened by scare stories about valve seat recession - most of which are pure fiction.
Redex was popular because folk feared a lack of upper cylinder lubrication. Judging by the amount of oil that engines took in via valves in times past, I would imagine that it was a gimmick. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
baconsdozen

Joined: 03 Dec 2007 Posts: 1119 Location: Under the car.
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2015 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I've used two stroke oil as an additive in my ex london taxi for years. I've tested before and after lots of times and it reduces knock and the engine is smoother and quieter. I doubt it lubricates the bores at all but apparently modifies the burn of the diesel fuel.
The only slight problem is some cheap brands seem to form a residue that settles in the base of the tank. _________________ Thirty years selling imperial hand tools for old machinery(Now happily retired). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|