|
Author |
Message |
Ellis
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 1386 Location: Betws y Coed, North Wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:05 pm Post subject: Petrol v Diesel in modern vehicles |
|
|
Some people will not buy a diesel vehicle and many diesel vehicle drivers are unlikely to return to buy a petrol engined one.
The first diesel vehicle I drove was an Austin J4 van in the early 1970s and what I remember clearly was the noise, smell and a top speed of around 60mph.
40 years later and I would not consider anything other than a diesel engined car or van for every day use. On a more prosaic level my elderly mother has driven diesels since 1994 and appreciates the fact that they are hard to stall.
New petrol engines are now very advanced, many having turbochargers, variable valve timing, all have fuel injection but I prefer the torque of a turbo diesel and the fuel consumption advantage especially now that diesel is cheaper than petrol.
In the future petrol engined cars will in all likelihood end up burning ethanol and bio diesel is already here. In Thailand all "diesel" vehicles must use locally produced palm oil derived diesel.
I believe that electric cars, fuel cell cars and the Hydrogen powered cars that BMW are experimenting and evaluating will be far in the future.
THe choice therefore in the medium term is petrol or diesel.
Which do you prefer and why? _________________ Starting Handle Expert
1964 Jaguar Mark 2 3.4 litre
1962 Land Rover Series 2a 88"
2002 BMW M3 E46 Cabriolet |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kevin2306
Joined: 01 Jul 2013 Posts: 1359 Location: nr Llangollen, north wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As a high mile muncher it's a diesel every time for me, current BMW 520 is superb with loads of torque and very quiet.
Last one was a golf and that was also very good but a bit small.
Biggest surprise was a recent hire car in a ford mondo 1.6 tdci, drove exceptionally well and you would never have thought it was a low cc diesel!
Kev |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
"THe choice therefore in the medium term is petrol or diesel. "
I don't agree; there's a greater choice than that now however, if I must plump for one or the other, I'd chose petrol. In fact I did last year when I bought an A8 4.2 petrol instead of a 3.0 diesel (the 4.2 diesel was out of my price range). After 15 years of driving diesels (Golf GTD, Ibiza TDI and two A4 TDIs) I've had enough of the noisy, smelly, polluting things. _________________ David
1963 Riley 1.5
1965 Riley 1.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kevin2306
Joined: 01 Jul 2013 Posts: 1359 Location: nr Llangollen, north wales
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
riley541 wrote: | "THe choice therefore in the medium term is petrol or diesel. "
I don't agree; there's a greater choice than that now however, if I must plump for one or the other, I'd chose petrol. In fact I did last year when I bought an A8 4.2 petrol instead of a 3.0 diesel (the 4.2 diesel was out of my price range). After 15 years of driving diesels (Golf GTD, Ibiza TDI and two A4 TDIs) I've had enough of the noisy, smelly, polluting things. |
Are not all conventional petrol/diesel cars noisy, smelly and polluting?
Kev |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ukdave2002
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4236 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Fri Aug 21, 2015 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We are talking modern here?
Last year I moved from a 6 cylinder BMW 6 series petrol to a 4 cylinder Mercedes E class's estate deisel and frankly haven't really noticed much difference in driving , had I been on a track it would have even different, but on the road the Merc diesel has all the torque I need
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
kevin2306 wrote: |
Are not all conventional petrol/diesel cars noisy, smelly and polluting?
Kev |
I know what offends more and so, I suspect, do you. _________________ David
1963 Riley 1.5
1965 Riley 1.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lowdrag
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 1600 Location: Le Mans
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Have been driving diesels for 15 years now and wouldn't go back if it weren't for my mileage getting smaller and potential problems with the DPF and concurrent cost thereof. Still, would a petrol achieve these statistics? I doubt it, and as said above, once moving I can't really tell the difference in my C class.
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7215 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Modern turbo diesels are slightly noisier than their petrol equivalents but the really high mid range torque of the diesel makes them much nicer things to drive than petrols.
A litre of diesel has a greater energy content than a litre of petrol so diesels will always give better mpg.
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
emmerson
Joined: 30 Sep 2008 Posts: 1268 Location: South East Wales
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I worked too long on diesel engines to even consider one in my private car. Dirty smelly noisy spawn of the devil stuff!
As herself and I left our local cafe this morning, a merc diesel and a mondeo diesel went past, and the smell lingered for ages.Its horrible.
I'll stick with my "modern" 1.8 petrol Berlingo, and my Range Rover LSE V8, which is on (almost) non-polluting LPG. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ashley
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 1426 Location: Near Stroud, Glos
|
Posted: Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peter scott wrote: | Modern turbo diesels are slightly noisier than their petrol equivalents but the really high mid range torque of the diesel makes them much nicer things to drive than petrols.
A litre of diesel has a greater energy content than a litre of petrol so diesels will always give better mpg.
Peter |
I've got a C180, it's a little higher revving than the C220, but engine characteristics are pretty much the same. All torque and surprisingly quick, but not as economical. It was cheaper than the diesels and I don't do great mileages, so I'm happy. It has a seven speed auto to die for, but I sometimes prefer the ride and comfort of my 1951 Bentley. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Keith D
Joined: 16 Oct 2008 Posts: 1165 Location: Upper Swan, Western Australia
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
I loathe diesels!
I hate the smell of the fuel, both burnt and unburnt. I hate standing in a pool of the stuff if I fill a car. Spilled petrol evaporates - diesel doesn't, So I take the stink inside the car on my shoes. The engines seem always slimy with an oily sheen that Australian dust quickly adheres to.
I understand that it is highly carcinogenic. (World Health Organisation)
IMHO diesel engines belong in tractors, trucks and trains, not in cars.
As far as economy goes, diesel vehicles are far dearer to buy (In Australia) than their petrol equivalents. My son has a diesel Mitsubishi Pajero and tells me how much less fuel he uses than my petrol Jeep Cherokee. The Jeep is fed LPG and my actual fuel cost in dollars is far less than his diesel. And I don't have to listen to the sound of a hammer banging on an anvil! And I don't create anywhere near as much pollution.
My Mitsubishi Magna (3.5 litre 6 cylinder petrol) I run on LPG. It uses a bit more gas than petrol, but cost wise it equates with about 40 - 45 mpg on petrol and I drive quite hard and fast and frequently tow.
I'll stick with LPG powered petrol engines thanks!
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clan chieftain

Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 2041 Location: Motherwell
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 10:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
My son has a 1993 Astra petrol with the Ecotec engine. It is a great running car with only 38000. It is sore on oil but there are no oil leaks. He says this is common with the Ecotec. Surely he cant be right.? _________________ The Clan Chieftain |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7215 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ashley wrote: |
I've got a C180, it's a little higher revving than the C220, but engine characteristics are pretty much the same. |
C180 SE 184lb-ft
C220 CDi 266lb-ft
Peter  _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ukdave2002
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4236 Location: South Cheshire
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Keith
5 years ago I would have the same veiw as you, but frankly modern diesels knock spots of petrol counterparts on every level, as Peter illustrated.
I remember driving a naturally aspirated diesel Vauxhall Astra over the Pennines on the M62 a few years ago, It was noisy I was getting overtaken by lorries on the hills !! It was truly awful ! , however things have changed over the last decade or so, not much can be done about the smell, but they are now quiet, refined, powerful as well as being economical .
So here is one person who a few years ago would have had a diesel "over my dead body" now a convert .
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
47Jag
Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bothwell, Scotland
|
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I love my diesel Jaguar XF. The power that it has is amazing. I have to drive with the handbrake on to keep the speed down
Art |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|