|
Author |
Message |
TonyBrooks
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 108 Location: Maidenhead
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:43 am Post subject: Seat Belt Law? |
|
|
I have a 1971 car with just two front seats, it is presently fitted with rally full harness belts.
My son intends driving his new bride from the church to the reception in it and of course a full harness belt and a wedding dress do not really go together!
Ignoring the safety aspect for a moment, I believe I can remove the belts completely and as such it then becomes legal not to wear seat belts. My understanding is that it only became compulsory to wear belt in 1983.
Can any one confirm this as I am receiving conflicting advice and an examination of various official sites do not seem to really cover this point.
Thanks _________________ Dinalpin Berlinette (Alpine Renault A110) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Riley Blue
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 1751 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
The requirement to fit front seat belts applies to all new cars from 1968 so as your car was made in 1971, it must have had seat belts fitted from new and the law passed in 1983 requires you to wear them. _________________ David
1963 Riley 1.5
1965 Riley 1.5 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Fatbloke

Joined: 26 Jun 2014 Posts: 86 Location: Royal Wootton Bassett
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep. what he said. only if the car was built without seatbelts new, can you get away without wearing them.
AND if someone has fitted belts to pre 68 cars they have to be worn. _________________ Mike,
A Fatbloke in a Herald. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TonyBrooks
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 108 Location: Maidenhead
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tanks for that - I did overlook the fact that my car was originally built in Mexico (a Dinalpin) - do the rules still apply to non UK built cars? _________________ Dinalpin Berlinette (Alpine Renault A110) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
clan chieftain

Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 2041 Location: Motherwell
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would imagine the rules would apply and belts would need to be fitted to conform with our laws. The DVLA would keep you right. _________________ The Clan Chieftain |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1763 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
riley541 wrote: | The requirement to fit front seat belts applies to all new cars from 1968... |
I thought it was 1965? My Herald is a '64, and came with an incomplete set of static belts, so when preparing for a return to the road I looked into whether I would have to spend £££'s I didn't have on replacing the lot or digging around for parts to make them work before I could get it MOT'd. I'm sure I found the first belt law came in 1965 before I breathed a huge sigh of relief and chucked the old belts in the bin, and once I got used to driving without a belt I came to actively prefer it - I haven't yet driven a car with belts that don't chafe on my neck. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mikeC

Joined: 31 Jul 2009 Posts: 1808 Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It certainly used to be 1965: I always avoided buying post-1964 cars for that very reason  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Penman
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 4850 Location: Swindon, Wilts.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 23, 2015 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi
In the UK, a requirement for front anchorage points was introduced in 1965, followed by the requirement in 1968 to fit three-point belts in the front outboard positions on all new cars and all existing cars back to 1965.
Interesting wording mentioning "outboard" but of course there were still bench seats available seating 3 in front at that time.
Compulsory fitment of Rear belts came in in 1987
Compulsory wearing of said belts came in (Front 1983, Rear 1991) _________________ Bristols should always come in pairs.
Any 2 from:-
Straight 6
V8 V10 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JohnDale

Joined: 19 Mar 2008 Posts: 790 Location: Kelvin Valley,Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
mikeC wrote: | It certainly used to be 1965: I always avoided buying post-1964 cars for that very reason  |
This MAY help - from the testers manual:-
http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_510.htm
Cheers,JD. _________________ 1958 Ford Zephyr Mk2 Convertible
1976 Ford Granada Ghia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mikeC

Joined: 31 Jul 2009 Posts: 1808 Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire
|
Posted: Thu Sep 24, 2015 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks,JD. That confirms that cars registered before January 1st 1965 do not need seatbelts, but if fitted they must comply with the regulations (and must be worn at all times). All cars after that date must have seat belts fitted.
This must be one of the few regulations which apply retrospectively; I suppose twin rear lights is one off the few others. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
lowdrag
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 1600 Location: Le Mans
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whisper it, but I often, if doing a short journey, just drape the harness over me and don't fasten it. Or don't wear it at all If it is a short journey it would be a very sad plod who booked the young lady in her wedding weeds. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
colwyn500
Joined: 21 Oct 2012 Posts: 1745 Location: Nairn, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lowdrag wrote: | Whisper it, but I often, if doing a short journey, just drape the harness over me and don't fasten it. Or don't wear it at all If it is a short journey it would be a very sad plod who booked the young lady in her wedding weeds. |
My old mate Bob, now sady gone, used to have a piece of seatbelt webbing fastened above the real seatbelt and long enough to drape across for just that purpose. I always thought it just as easy to put the seatbelt on! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bitumen Boy
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 1763 Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lowdrag wrote: | Or don't wear it at all If it is a short journey it would be a very sad plod who booked the young lady in her wedding weeds. |
Agreed, but unfortunately modern Britain is full of just such very sad plods. Booking ordinary punters for minor, technical and victimless breaches of the law is just so much easier than persuing thugs, thieves, drug dealers and perverts... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BigJohn
Joined: 01 Jan 2011 Posts: 954 Location: Wem, Shropshire
|
Posted: Fri Sep 25, 2015 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Or maybe just sad plods who hate picking peoples faces out of windscreens....... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JohnDale

Joined: 19 Mar 2008 Posts: 790 Location: Kelvin Valley,Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Living on an island where the roads were often alongside sea cliff, even after seat belts came in, no one wore them. In an accident(or a mistake with the road edge) it was more likely to need to escape from the vehicle to avoid drowning. Now it's as automatic as turning the ignition key to put on the belt.
Cheers,JD. _________________ 1958 Ford Zephyr Mk2 Convertible
1976 Ford Granada Ghia. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|