|
Author |
Message |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7102 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 5:37 pm Post subject: When a 'Special' really is special. |
|
|
https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1345328
What do we think about 'specials' ?
I am reluctant to give my whole hearted support for what usually passes for a 'special' because to my mind they are very often far from it.
Then I saw this Riley and thought "WOW!"
The problem as we know is that far too many mundane but worthy saloons have been sacrificed to produce something rather less than special.
If the final outcome is a really great looking car should we feel quite as sad about the donor car.? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alastairq
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Posts: 2119 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like 'specials'....
The world of 'specials' is one I have long dabbled in.
But I find that world changing somewhat, driven by the idea of 'value' and 'investment'....
Once upon a time the 'special' was the province of ardent motoring enthusiasts.
Sometimes to improve on what was available at the time...[Tribsas, Norvins, Tritons, etc for example]
Sometimes as a way of solving a motoring desire, when the objects of that desire are financially well out of reach? [The prolific post-WW2 flood of Ford-based specials, for example?}
Manufactures are as guilty as any at producing specials....
Or the creation of something useable out of something terminally unusable? [Re-cycling, if one will?}
What I do not like is the wanton destruction of old vehicles simply to produce something eminently more desirable, therefore more 'valuable' [in the marketplace] than the humble originals..
I have a Ford [Pop] chassis with logbook/vED...obtained wit the idea of making a Ford-based 'special'.....the body was kernackered...and well beyond my humble financial means to put right...But a special can be, simply, what it is.
Of course there are 'specials' built with a purpose in mind...for example, in the world of mucky trialling, the class 8 specials...Many not in any way pretty, but functional, in their creators' eyes. L love 'em all!
Including the Wolseley Hornet based special with its big Hornet engine, blown courtesy of, I think, some sort of Mercedes school-run special? No way was the body saveable, I recall.....although parts of it were used.....But, by 'eck it can climb! _________________ Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7102 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The above Riley "Blue Streak" special would have cost far more to produce than it will ever sell for so it doesn't fall into the category of an investment. That said; it will probably have entailed the destruction of the original 2 1/2litre "blue streak" Kestral for it's engine and no doubt the destruction of a charming 12hp Adelphi for it's superior chassis.
"You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs" is one way of looking at it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mikeC

Joined: 31 Jul 2009 Posts: 1809 Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
That Riley is a fine-looking car, but at £145,000 there are any number of 'original' cars from the same period that I would far rather own. Like this Alvis, for example:
https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1401776
or this Talbot 105 with period Factory competition history:
https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1396199 _________________ in the garage: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
Recently departed: 1953 Lancia Appia, 1931 Austin Seven, 1967 Singer Chamois, 1914 Saxon, 1930 Morris Cowley, 1936 BSA Scout, 1958 Lancia Appia coupe, 1922 Star 11.9 ... the list goes on! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rootes75
Joined: 30 Apr 2013 Posts: 4173 Location: The Somerset Levels
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure where I sit with specials tbh but at £145k I am in agreement with Mike that I would go for something original and with some history. _________________ Various Rootes Vehicles. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7102 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rootes75 wrote: | Not sure where I sit with specials tbh but at £145k I am in agreement with Mike that I would go for something original and with some history. |
I wonder if it was a project where the costs just got out of hand?..... (I know all about that!!)....... They say it cost in excess of £200,000 so perhaps they are just cutting their losses and will take any realistic offer when it comes to it.?
I think creating an accurate replica of a famous race car or suchlike would be a safer bet than just building something that looks good but in the end there are some wonderful genuine original cars to choose from so it may well be difficult to sell.
Nice as it may be; I won't be making an offer.
Last edited by Ray White on Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7214 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7102 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
peter scott wrote: | Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?
Peter |
...especially when you can fit a Dynamater that looks like a dynamo but with twice the output. Unless one does a lot of night time driving...unlikely.. it's just money down the drain... I should know!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alastairq
Joined: 14 Oct 2016 Posts: 2119 Location: East Yorkshire
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Possibly a 'space' issue? I note the alternator is mounted back-to-front? _________________ Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mikeC

Joined: 31 Jul 2009 Posts: 1809 Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peter scott wrote: | Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?
Peter |
Because the original dynamo ran off the front of the crankshaft where the supercharger is now fitted; but fitting an alternator immediately renders the car ineligible for VSCC events - surely the whole point of the car? _________________ in the garage: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
Recently departed: 1953 Lancia Appia, 1931 Austin Seven, 1967 Singer Chamois, 1914 Saxon, 1930 Morris Cowley, 1936 BSA Scout, 1958 Lancia Appia coupe, 1922 Star 11.9 ... the list goes on! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7214 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikeC wrote: |
Because the original dynamo ran off the front of the crankshaft where the supercharger is now fitted |
I don't think any of these Rileys had the dynamo directly connected to the crankshaft and projecting out the front. There must be some other reason why they couldn't fit the dynamo on the other side of the engine as in the car pictured below. Perhaps the steering column was too long / couldn't be easily shortened?? Apologies for the off screen photo size. I just used an external link.
Peter
 _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7102 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mikeC wrote: | peter scott wrote: | Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?
Peter |
Because the original dynamo ran off the front of the crankshaft where the supercharger is now fitted; but fitting an alternator immediately renders the car ineligible for VSCC events - surely the whole point of the car? |
I would doubt there was ever any "point" to the car; save it looked a bit like something Riley might have produced. My guess is that at best it is an 'imp' substitute.? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Brent29
Joined: 07 Jun 2018 Posts: 63
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's a beautiful Riley! Putting modern parts is inevitable. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
peter scott

Joined: 18 Dec 2007 Posts: 7214 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brent29 wrote: | That's a beautiful Riley! Putting modern parts is inevitable. |
It may be inevitable but I'm sure they don't have to be visible.
Peter _________________ https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ray White

Joined: 02 Dec 2014 Posts: 7102 Location: Derby
|
Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, the closer you look the more absurd the asking price. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|