|  | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Ray White 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Dec 2014
 Posts: 7154
 Location: Derby
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2022 11:02 pm    Post subject: Rev counters |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| The first car I had with a rev counter was my 1973 Triumph GT6 Mk3. I had been driving for many years before that without the need for one... but with the extra dial I discovered a whole new way of driving. 
 At first, I was quite keen and after a time, glancing at the 'counter became second nature... but because of the way I had always driven, there seemed to be little point in doing so.     I tend to listen to what the engine is telling me, so I don't need a rev counter, for example,  to tell me when to change gear.
 
 I found I could use the instrument to tell me what speed I was doing ... but I have a speedo for that.  I am also rather slow at mental arithmetics so I just glance at the speedo to check my speed.  There again, I am pretty good at judging my speed so the whole exercise becomes rather academic anyway.
 
 As it happens, I have become a rather lazy driver; with my 'modern' being an automatic, I only watch the rev counter to check that the kick down is operating as it should. In an auto it has little other merit as far as I can tell.
 
 There seems to be a certain "machismo" amongst some drivers who seem to have need of a rev counter in order to extract the most from their engines.  Despite not being racing drivers, they seem to attach a certain sporting pride to their prowess with this instrument.
 
 Do we have a general opinion on the use of a tachometer?
 
 DO YOU USE YOURS?
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Keith D 
 
 
 Joined: 16 Oct 2008
 Posts: 1165
 Location: Upper Swan, Western Australia
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 4:56 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Like Ray, I use my ears rather than a tacho to know how my engine is performing, and drive to keep my engine as stress free as possible. An automatic gearbox really removes any need for a tacho except to 'balance' the facia panel with the speedo. I will glance at mine when stopped at a noisy, busy intersection to make sure the motor is still running. Otherwise it needn't be there.
 
 Keith D
 _________________
 1926 Chrysler 60 tourer
 1932 Austin Seven RN long wheelbase box sedan
 1950 Austin A40 tourer
 1999 BMW Z3
 Its weird being the same age as old people.
 You are either part of the problem or part of the solution
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| bjacko 
 
 
 Joined: 28 Oct 2013
 Posts: 528
 Location: Melbourne Australia
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 7:18 am    Post subject: Tachos |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| The only time I use my tacho is to check my speed when the speedometer decides to stop working, otherwise I use my ears. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| badhuis 
 
  
 Joined: 20 Aug 2008
 Posts: 1469
 Location: Netherlands
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 7:51 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| On automatics the tacho is not needed. But in my TR4, it is useful for not getting much over 5000 rpm when accelerating.
 I fitted a tacho in my Imp because I wondered how many rpms the engine did. The Imp can have quite high rpms and I found out I could go much higher than I always did. Not that it is necessary but it is nice to know.
 _________________
 a car stops being fun when it becomes an investment
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ray White 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Dec 2014
 Posts: 7154
 Location: Derby
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 10:21 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Badhuis is right ... up to a point.  If the car has an automatic transmission then it does not need to have a tacho fitted as standard equipment... but a tacho IS required for adjusting the down shift cable. However,  for most people, the replacement or repair of an automatic gearbox is best left to a garage who will most likely us a hand held version. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| peter scott 
 
  
 Joined: 18 Dec 2007
 Posts: 7215
 Location: Edinburgh
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 10:25 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Regardless of what I do to the speedo cable in my SS the reading sways about so I tend to use the rev counter to tell me my exact speed as it is stable and with top gear being 20 mph/1000 rpm I have no difficulty doing the sums. 
 For many years I was driving on dural rods and decided that I would limit myself to 3500 rpm max so it was useful in giving me a limit that was better defined than my sense of pitch.
 
 I also calibrated the rev counter with a stroboscope so I can trust it better than my speedo. It's useful for setting the idle speed when the engine is cold. I know that it will idle happily at 450 rpm so I can set the hand throttle thus when I switch off the choke.
 
 Peter.
 _________________
 https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
 1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ray White 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Dec 2014
 Posts: 7154
 Location: Derby
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 10:33 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | peter scott wrote: |  	  | Regardless of what I do to the speedo cable in my SS the reading sways about so I tend to use the rev counter to tell me my exact speed as it is stable and with top gear being 20 mph/1000 rpm I have no difficulty doing the sums. 
 For many years I was driving on dural rods and decided that I would limit myself to 3500 rpm max so it was useful in giving me a limit that was better defined than my sense of pitch.
 
 I also calibrated the rev counter with a stroboscope so I can trust it better than my speedo. It's useful for setting the idle speed when the engine is cold. I know that it will idle happily at 450 rpm so I can set the hand throttle thus when I switch off the choke.
 
 Peter.
 | 
 
 What was your reasoning behind the decision to limit the engine to 3,500 r.p.m. Peter?
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| peter scott 
 
  
 Joined: 18 Dec 2007
 Posts: 7215
 Location: Edinburgh
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 11:51 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Ray White wrote: |  	  | What was your reasoning behind the decision to limit the engine to 3,500 r.p.m. Peter?
 | 
 
 Nothing very scientific. The red line on the rev counter is at maximum power, namely 4500 rpm but I hadn't balanced the engine back then and it was noticeably rougher above 3500 rpm so my feeling was that there was not a simple linear relationship between the reciprocating forces due to the rapid accelerations and decelerations of the pistons and speed. The engine just felt much more comfortable staying below 3500 rpm.
 
 Since fitting steel rods and balancing the engine it is much smoother all the way up to maximum power so I now rev it with gay abandon.
 
 Peter
 _________________
 https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
 1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ray White 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Dec 2014
 Posts: 7154
 Location: Derby
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 12:39 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Thank you for that explanation, Peter.  I think having the engine balanced and fitted with steel rods was very wise.  The driving experience must have been considerably improved.! 
 I have had my rebuilt TC engine fully balanced for similar reasons.  Although some owners have seen balancing as a way to push the rev range higher,  it has been known for a long time that the XPAG engine revved to fast for it's gearing, with the result that it's life is shortened considerably.
 
 I have tried to calm things down where possible and to this end have opted for a higher ratio rear axle (down from 5.12 :1 to 4. 875 : 1) and a 5 speed gearbox.  The 40% increase in power gained by using a supercharger should be more than adequate to pull the higher gearing.
 
 Top gear motoring should-  as a result of these modifications - be a more relaxed affair and as I tend to not bother with the rev counter much, I have controversially  opted to move it's location in the dashboard.  No doubt purists will say it is "wrong" - and they have a point - but on the TC the speedo  is placed over to the far left where it is not much use.
 
 Taking advantage of the extra length of the speedo cable that came with the T9 gearbox , I am switching over the instruments to allow for easier speedo reading as it will now be in my line of sight.
 
 I am pretty sure MG realised the original layout could be improved upon as the TD - and all subsequent cars - had these two instruments 'close coupled.'
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Rich5ltr 
 
  
 Joined: 28 Mar 2008
 Posts: 681
 Location: Hampshire, UK
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 9:16 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Interestingly it's the same in my 1933 Lagonda. Speedo in front of the passenger, time piece and rev counter in front of the driver. Obviously in those days being on time and looking after the engine was more important than trifling issues like speed limits! 	  | Ray White wrote: |  	  | <clip>  I have controversially  opted to move it's location in the dashboard.  No doubt purists will say it is "wrong" - and they have a point - but on the TC the speedo  is placed over to the far left where it is not much use...
 | 
 
 Last edited by Rich5ltr on Fri Oct 28, 2022 2:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| mikeC 
 
  
 Joined: 31 Jul 2009
 Posts: 1810
 Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 8:26 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| The 30mph speed limit was not introduced until 1935, so as you suggest speed was only of minor concern. _________________
 in the garage: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
 Recently departed: 1953 Lancia Appia, 1931 Austin Seven, 1967 Singer Chamois, 1914 Saxon, 1930 Morris Cowley, 1936 BSA Scout, 1958 Lancia Appia coupe, 1922 Star 11.9 ... the list goes on!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ray White 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Dec 2014
 Posts: 7154
 Location: Derby
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:54 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| By 1949, when my MG TC was produced, this dashboard layout had become very outdated. MG could have reversed the instruments (like I have) but for whatever reason chose not to. 
 With speed cameras everywhere I feel somewhat justified in making the change.
 
 I wouldn't  be the first to do it.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| peter scott 
 
  
 Joined: 18 Dec 2007
 Posts: 7215
 Location: Edinburgh
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 10:35 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | Ray White wrote: |  	  | By 1949, when my MG TC was produced, this dashboard layout had become very outdated. MG could have reversed the instruments (like I have) but for whatever reason chose not to. 
 With speed cameras everywhere I feel somewhat justified in making the change.
 
 I wouldn't  be the first to do it.
 | 
 
 Of course with your 30 light you don't really need a speedometer.
 
 Peter
  _________________
 https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
 1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Ray White 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Dec 2014
 Posts: 7154
 Location: Derby
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 11:17 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | peter scott wrote: |  	  |  	  | Ray White wrote: |  	  | By 1949, when my MG TC was produced, this dashboard layout had become very outdated. MG could have reversed the instruments (like I have) but for whatever reason chose not to. 
 With speed cameras everywhere I feel somewhat justified in making the change.
 
 I wouldn't  be the first to do it.
 | 
 
 Of course with your 30 light you don't really need a speedometer.
 
 Peter
  | 
 
 Except that my car was an export model and didn't have one.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Crashbox 
 
 
 Joined: 30 Apr 2021
 Posts: 148
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2022 2:36 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Folk are often shocked to learn there were no speed limits on any road between 1930 and 1934. The Highways Act 1930 did away with the 20mph blanket speed limit introduced in 1903, that had replaced the 14mph limit brought in by the Locomotives on Highways Act 1896 (which did away with the 4mph limit and the legal requirement to have one's man walking ahead of one's motorcar waving a red flag). The Motor Car Act 1934 brought in the 30mph limit in built-up areas, but left other roads untouched by any restriction in speed, other than that that one's car can manage... About 50mph in the case of my 1932 Morris Minor!! 
   
 The early history of the car is something that fascinates me. I quite fancy a run down to Sussex next weekend to watch the 'Old Crocks' heading down to Brighton. Sadly, the weather doesn't look promising.
 _________________
 1989 2CV
 
 1932 Morris Minor S.V. Two-Seater
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |