classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

What do you like or dislike about moderns?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> General Motoring & Collectables (inc Classic Caravans)
Author Message
Dirty Habit



Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 398
Location: West Midlands, UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:54 pm    Post subject: What do you like or dislike about moderns? Reply with quote

My pet hate about moderns is the electronics. I don't believe that so many are needed and I wonder who they benefit. Take for example an immobiliser. OK car thefts have dropped dramatically, but do insurance premiums reflect that? I don't think they do. And when they fail you are faced with a huge bill. The unit may only be the size of a pack of cigarettes but by the time you have bought a replacement and had it coded at a main dealers, you will have spent more than the cost of a 40" flat screen TV.
It is not rust or worn out mechanical parts that are sending cars to the scrappers.........it is the masses of high priced electronic components.
_________________
1964 International Harvester
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
victor 101



Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 446
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My brother has just traded his Honda in on the scrappage scheme, engine was good, but they wanted £1500 to replace a air con pump, and another £1500 to fix the fault in the antilock brakes, my son has a Fiat Multipla and they want £150 for an ign key with transponder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Brian M



Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 783
Location: Leigh-on-Sea, Essex

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't start me off about electronics on moderns.

My previous Jeep Cherokee only let me down once, when the "Crankshaft Motion Sensor" failed.

This wondrous invention stops fuel getting through and prevents sparks until it detects that the flywheel is turning. Funny thing is that when I turn the starter, I actually want petrol and sparks to be provided! If it is there to stop the petrol and sparks when the engine is not rotating, after an accident for instance, surely it could be overridden when the starter motor is in use?

At least the replacement was only £80 and can be fitted by a competent amateur.
_________________
Brian
1970 Volvo Amazon and 1978 Safari 15-4 Caravan
Classic Safari Forum: www.classicsafaris.co.uk
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Riley Blue



Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 1751
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 7:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right now I dislike the fact that the household shopping car, a Fiesta, has a heated front screen but my Audi A4 doesn't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
clan chieftain



Joined: 05 Apr 2008
Posts: 2041
Location: Motherwell

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A set of injectors for a Mondeo diesel is over £1000. Then they have to be programmed in. Gone are the days when you stuck in a set of 9Ys.They fitted nearly everything. Laughing Laughing Laughing
_________________
The Clan Chieftain
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Rick
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 22840
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd echo my dislike of modern cars' over-complexity. Ok it helps their economy I suppose, but if they weren't so heavy in the first place, they'd produce good mpg without all the electrickery. As for gimmicks, I can't stand them.

Moderns are good for covering distances easily and swiftly, but most mainstream motors are so uninvolving that wherever possible I'll run an oldie instead. Safety improvements also have to be mentioned, although people still seem to crash quite regularly, even in moderns (I suppose they have more chance of getting out though).

RJ
_________________
Rick - Admin
Home:https://www.oldclassiccar.co.uk
Videos:https://www.youtube.com/user/oldclassiccarRJ/videos
OCC & classic car merchandise (Austin, Ford ++):
https://www.redbubble.com/people/OldClassicCar/shop
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith D



Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 1174
Location: Upper Swan, Western Australia

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobody loves old cars more than I do and I thoroughly enjoy driving them. Manual gears require a certain amount of skill to accomplish smooth quiet gearchanges, especially with crash boxes, or where the syncro is badly worn. The cars are full of quirky little habits that need mastering! And they do not offend my eyes! The styling in most cases is far more interesting and distinctive than most "moderns". At the moment, the only current car I find even the slightest bit attractive is the new BMW Z4, and that is way out of my price range! The current "hatch" epidemic leaves me horrified!

However, lets get serious!

Breakdowns are very rare in modern cars. My own experience has been that problems that occur initially, until the car has bedded down, are covered by the warranty which in most cases in Australia is 5 years.
I like air conditioning, power steering on big cars, power disc brakes, five or six speed manual gearboxes and fuel injection.

Replacement costs for injectors may be expensive, but they so rarely go wrong. I owned my Mitsubishi Lancer coupe for 200,000 kilometres and the only time the injectors were touched, was a clean out at about 100,000 km. That cost me a mere $130 in 2001. (About 50 pounds at that time) I had a Mk 2 Jag back in the sixties, when it was almost new and apart from the fact that it loved to boil in our climate, I learned to loathe SU carburettors. The Mk 2 had two of these disasters that always started fighting each other within a few miles of a tune up!

I don't have to suffer the cold conditions that you do in the UK, but I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned the useless heaters in the old cars, (generally only fitted as extras or options) at least in the mass production models during the fifties. We used to call them "fug stirrers"! Then there was the wonderful windscreen wipers made by Lucas for Austin (and others) driven by a piece of wire jerking backwards and forwards, that assumed it would never rain! Austin brakes were never very good! My A40 is fitted with much larger A70 brakes which give me a better chance of stopping!

Despite what I have said, I love restoring the oldies and driving them at the weekend or on holidays, but I certainly prefer modern stuff when going to work in the rush hour or on a serious journey!

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bob2



Joined: 06 Dec 2007
Posts: 1728
Location: Malta

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tend to agree with Keith but I too think that modern cars have too much electronic gadgets and sensors, although when you have the software and equipment at hand its quite easy to diagnose and remedy to faults.
I have a friend with a very well equipped garage and adjusting such faults on moderns was a doddle!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ashley



Joined: 02 Jan 2008
Posts: 1426
Location: Near Stroud, Glos

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They all seem so similar to drive to me, the Germans are often as harsh as a series one Land Rover, but otherwise all are excellent, but hideous in my opinion. Dreadful colours and utterly horrid styling so that wherever you park them, they ruin the landscape. Old cars look as though they belong, they just aren't very good cars!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ukdave2002



Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 4287
Location: South Cheshire

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So looking at the majority of comments;
We like the fact that modern cars are incredibly reliable, start every time, have long gaps between servicing , cost far less to maintain than 30 years ago, easy to fix, will do very high mileages without needing major work , etc etc….

But we don’t like the technology that delivers it all !!

I wonder if there had been a “Classic Horse & Cart” forum 100 years ago would they have similar thing to say about these new fangled cars !!! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Dirty Habit



Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 398
Location: West Midlands, UK

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ukdave2002 wrote:
So looking at the majority of comments;
We like the fact that modern cars are incredibly reliable, start every time, have long gaps between servicing , cost far less to maintain than 30 years ago, easy to fix, will do very high mileages without needing major work , etc etc….

But we don’t like the technology that delivers it all !!

I wonder if there had been a “Classic Horse & Cart” forum 100 years ago would they have similar thing to say about these new fangled cars !!! Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy


I don't like the technology that does not deliver the above.

As for easy to fix, perhaps they are..........if you have a LAUNCH X431 in the boot Very Happy Very Happy Very Happy
_________________
1964 International Harvester
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lowdrag



Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 1600
Location: Le Mans

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A couple of years back Mercedes, dismayed by the breakdowns on the E class, had their boffins take one apart and try and sort it out. The result was they took out six hundred electronic relays and circuits to make the car reliable again. That being said, my old W202 has 200,000 on the clock and runs (touch wood) perfectly without even the injectiors needing cleaning and strangely only two glow plugs have failed.

But what I hate about new cars isn't the electronics, it's the styling in the main. I spoke with a senior Jaguar designer and he said that because of CAD-CAM and the crush zones the only way really to distinguish cars today is by the grille, which is why Audi have made theirs more obtrusive for example. He reckons that underneath most are fairly the same in design to get the coveted five stars in the crash tests.

So, we're safer, we are comfier, but being human we don't like being mollycoddled I guess.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jim.Walker



Joined: 27 Dec 2008
Posts: 1229
Location: Chesterfield

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Firstly, I don't like the massive depreciation that goes with them. Then I don't like the power steering that seems compulsory these days and which overPOWERS all feedback which might tell you that you are on ice or slippery surfaces. Of course I accept that large, heavy vehicles benefit from it. But shopping trolley sized cars??

AND they make driving so easy it seems very little skill is needed to progress smoothly, and that is boring on a long run. No sense of satisfaction when the run is completed. Is there any wonder so many drivers go to sleep at the wheel?
_________________
Quote from my late Dad:- You only need a woman and a car and you have all the problems you
are ever likely to want". Computers had not been invented then!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7219
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jim.Walker wrote:
I don't like the massive depreciation that goes with them.


Have to disagree on that one. Unlike cars of 30 or 40 years ago that became structural nightmares if even slightly neglected, cars of the last couple of decades just run for ever with minimal maintenance. Bodies don't rot, exhaust systems last 100k miles engines don't show any deterioration after similar milages. There's absolutely no reason to scrap cars that have zero worth and thus zero depreciation. They remain as quiet comfortable and economical as they were when new.

Peter
_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The_Boy_Richie



Joined: 04 Jan 2010
Posts: 45

PostPosted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Love the reliability of my Honda Accord and would only ever buy Japanese modern cars now.
A reliable modern makes classic car ownership a viable proposition for me. There's no way I could do my job and travel from Cheshire to the North of Cumbria in a day in any of my classics.

The Honda is a tool and the classics are for fun....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> General Motoring & Collectables (inc Classic Caravans) All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.