classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

What's in Lead Substitute Additive?
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat
Author Message
colwyn500



Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 1745
Location: Nairn, Scotland

PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2015 11:17 pm    Post subject: What's in Lead Substitute Additive? Reply with quote

Yesterday, when struggling to remove the "grandad-proof" cap on the expensive stuff I stick in the petrol tank on each fill, I ended up covered in the liquid.
It looks, feels and really smells like red diesel. Rhetorical question, "Am I being conned?"
More to the point, what is actually in lead replacement additive and how does it work?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Peter_L



Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 2680
Location: New Brunswick. Canada.

PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 12:06 am    Post subject: Re: What's in Lead Substitute Additive? Reply with quote

colwyn500 wrote:
Yesterday, when struggling to remove the "grandad-proof" cap on the expensive stuff I stick in the petrol tank on each fill, I ended up covered in the liquid.
It looks, feels and really smells like red diesel. Rhetorical question, "Am I being conned?"
More to the point, what is actually in lead replacement additive and how does it work?


You should have given it a 5 year old, they can get the tops of much better than me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mog



Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 663
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I only used to put additive in my 6 cly. Ford if I was going on a longer trip, say 100 miles or more. Just driving around locally, it never got that hot/warm. I was told you could put automatic oil [fluid ] in for the same effect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dipster



Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 408
Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....

PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 8:35 am    Post subject: Re: What's in Lead Substitute Additive? Reply with quote

colwyn500 wrote:
Yesterday, when struggling to remove the "grandad-proof" cap on the expensive stuff I stick in the petrol tank on each fill, I ended up covered in the liquid.
It looks, feels and really smells like red diesel. Rhetorical question, "Am I being conned?"
More to the point, what is actually in lead replacement additive and how does it work?


Who remembers "shots" of Redex? If I recall that was promoted as an "upper cylinder lubricant". Same stuff perchance?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bitumen Boy



Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 1763
Location: Above the snow line in old Monmouthshire

PostPosted: Sat May 02, 2015 9:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it probably is a con. I used one of the main brands of lead replacement additive, endorsed by the FBHVC, for years without problems, but then problems developed lower down in the engine and it was rebuild time. Now the car could still move about under its own power - only just - so to avoid having it "blocking" the garage for ages I found a spare engine in the next valley, and set about rebuilding that. Once I'd paid out for the rebore, regrind, pistons, bearings, gaskets etc there wasn't any spare cash for the top end. Now the valves were pretty bad, but they were just recoverable, with a bit of effort, so the head was reassembled, and the valves tested with paraffin before fitting back on to the engine. In my innocence I thought it would be fine if I just kept using the lead replacement additive... 4k miles later and I was removing the head again to be converted due to bad valves and seats. Essentially it seems that lead replacement additives "work" so long as the valves aren't disturbed, but as soon as the work hardened layer on old valves and seats is removed you might as well not bother. This does of course suggest that additives are useless under any circumstances, and I certainly wouldn't bother with another car - just accept that the head may need work at some future point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ka



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 600
Location: Orkney.

PostPosted: Sun May 03, 2015 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

These are the advertised contents, but different manufacturers use different contents,
Methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT)
Ferrocene
Iron pentacarbonyl
Toluene
Trimethylpentane (isooctane)
_________________
KA

Better three than four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mog



Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 663
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2015 4:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My older brother worked for Shell for many years. He said that the Shell "boffins " thought that shots of Redex was a waste of time, as they just got burnt up. Before they got to the cylinder walls. But wait a minute , what a bout a two stroke petrol engine ? The oil does get to the cylinder walls...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dipster



Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Posts: 408
Location: UK, France and Portugal - unless I am travelling....

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2015 7:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As Shell did not manufacture Redex I can easily imagine why they might discount any worth it might have. I just saw it as an extra income at the pump! And the dispenser "gun" as just something else to keep clean. They were always slightly oily and thus attracted forecourt dust.

I have no idea whether Redex actually worked.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7214
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2015 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mog wrote:
My older brother worked for Shell for many years. He said that the Shell "boffins " thought that shots of Redex was a waste of time, as they just got burnt up. Before they got to the cylinder walls. But wait a minute , what a bout a two stroke petrol engine ? The oil does get to the cylinder walls...


I can't say I'm convinced that Redex is useful but in a four stroke engine the induction stroke will let any Redex contact the cylinder walls before it gets burnt.

Peter
_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mog



Joined: 30 Dec 2007
Posts: 663
Location: Sydney

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 4:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

My brother and Shell were always ready to knock any other petrol / oil company.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ka



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 600
Location: Orkney.

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two strokes induct via the crankcase, so the oil content in the pre-mix solution would coat the cylinder sides and big/little ends. Later oil injected two strokes fed the main bearing and was 'washed' off by the fuel/air mixture to provide lubrication to little end and cylinder sides before transfer to combustion chamber then the big bang.
_________________
KA

Better three than four.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
goneps



Joined: 18 Jun 2013
Posts: 601
Location: Auckland, New Zealand

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 7:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In other words, two-strokes were lubricated by a 20:1 mixture of petroil and luck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MikeEdwards



Joined: 25 May 2011
Posts: 2705
Location: South Cheshire

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've got some "additive" but I rarely use it. I've been of the opinion that I don't do much mileage, little of it is on long motorway runs, at the limit my engine is turning over at around 3200rpm so not exactly 'fast', and I seem to have got away with it for about 15 years so far. Keeping in mind that the part of the head that will erode is the part that would be replaced if I were to have it "converted", I figured I'd have that done after it's eroded and I can't adjust the tappets any more, not just in case it does.

I should clarify I'm not claiming any specialist knowledge there, but I have been pleased to hear that people I think do have such knowledge seem to have the same thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7106
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2015 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MikeEdwards wrote:
I've got some "additive" but I rarely use it. I've been of the opinion that I don't do much mileage, little of it is on long motorway runs, at the limit my engine is turning over at around 3200rpm so not exactly 'fast', and I seem to have got away with it for about 15 years so far. Keeping in mind that the part of the head that will erode is the part that would be replaced if I were to have it "converted", I figured I'd have that done after it's eroded and I can't adjust the tappets any more, not just in case it does.

I should clarify I'm not claiming any specialist knowledge there, but I have been pleased to hear that people I think do have such knowledge seem to have the same thought.


I am in complete agreement. Many people will have had hardened valve seats fitted regardless of mileage because they have been frightened by scare stories about valve seat recession - most of which are pure fiction.
Redex was popular because folk feared a lack of upper cylinder lubrication. Judging by the amount of oil that engines took in via valves in times past, I would imagine that it was a gimmick.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
baconsdozen



Joined: 03 Dec 2007
Posts: 1119
Location: Under the car.

PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've used two stroke oil as an additive in my ex london taxi for years. I've tested before and after lots of times and it reduces knock and the engine is smoother and quieter. I doubt it lubricates the bores at all but apparently modifies the burn of the diesel fuel.
The only slight problem is some cheap brands seem to form a residue that settles in the base of the tank.
_________________
Thirty years selling imperial hand tools for old machinery(Now happily retired).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.