classic car forum header
Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Register     Posting Photographs     Privacy     F/book OCC Facebook     OCC on Patreon

When a 'Special' really is special.
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat
Author Message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7103
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 5:37 pm    Post subject: When a 'Special' really is special. Reply with quote



https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1345328

What do we think about 'specials' ?

I am reluctant to give my whole hearted support for what usually passes for a 'special' because to my mind they are very often far from it.

Then I saw this Riley and thought "WOW!"

The problem as we know is that far too many mundane but worthy saloons have been sacrificed to produce something rather less than special.

If the final outcome is a really great looking car should we feel quite as sad about the donor car.?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 2119
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like 'specials'....
The world of 'specials' is one I have long dabbled in.

But I find that world changing somewhat, driven by the idea of 'value' and 'investment'....

Once upon a time the 'special' was the province of ardent motoring enthusiasts.
Sometimes to improve on what was available at the time...[Tribsas, Norvins, Tritons, etc for example]
Sometimes as a way of solving a motoring desire, when the objects of that desire are financially well out of reach? [The prolific post-WW2 flood of Ford-based specials, for example?}
Manufactures are as guilty as any at producing specials....

Or the creation of something useable out of something terminally unusable? [Re-cycling, if one will?}

What I do not like is the wanton destruction of old vehicles simply to produce something eminently more desirable, therefore more 'valuable' [in the marketplace] than the humble originals..

I have a Ford [Pop] chassis with logbook/vED...obtained wit the idea of making a Ford-based 'special'.....the body was kernackered...and well beyond my humble financial means to put right...But a special can be, simply, what it is.

Of course there are 'specials' built with a purpose in mind...for example, in the world of mucky trialling, the class 8 specials...Many not in any way pretty, but functional, in their creators' eyes. L love 'em all!
Including the Wolseley Hornet based special with its big Hornet engine, blown courtesy of, I think, some sort of Mercedes school-run special? No way was the body saveable, I recall.....although parts of it were used.....But, by 'eck it can climb!
_________________
Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7103
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Mon Nov 22, 2021 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The above Riley "Blue Streak" special would have cost far more to produce than it will ever sell for so it doesn't fall into the category of an investment. That said; it will probably have entailed the destruction of the original 2 1/2litre "blue streak" Kestral for it's engine and no doubt the destruction of a charming 12hp Adelphi for it's superior chassis.

"You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs" is one way of looking at it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
mikeC



Joined: 31 Jul 2009
Posts: 1809
Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That Riley is a fine-looking car, but at £145,000 there are any number of 'original' cars from the same period that I would far rather own. Like this Alvis, for example:

https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1401776

or this Talbot 105 with period Factory competition history:

https://www.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C1396199
_________________
in the garage: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
Recently departed: 1953 Lancia Appia, 1931 Austin Seven, 1967 Singer Chamois, 1914 Saxon, 1930 Morris Cowley, 1936 BSA Scout, 1958 Lancia Appia coupe, 1922 Star 11.9 ... the list goes on!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rootes75



Joined: 30 Apr 2013
Posts: 4173
Location: The Somerset Levels

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure where I sit with specials tbh but at £145k I am in agreement with Mike that I would go for something original and with some history.
_________________
Various Rootes Vehicles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7103
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rootes75 wrote:
Not sure where I sit with specials tbh but at £145k I am in agreement with Mike that I would go for something original and with some history.


I wonder if it was a project where the costs just got out of hand?..... (I know all about that!!)....... They say it cost in excess of £200,000 so perhaps they are just cutting their losses and will take any realistic offer when it comes to it.?

I think creating an accurate replica of a famous race car or suchlike would be a safer bet than just building something that looks good but in the end there are some wonderful genuine original cars to choose from so it may well be difficult to sell.

Nice as it may be; I won't be making an offer.


Last edited by Ray White on Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:50 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7214
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?

Peter
_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7103
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

peter scott wrote:
Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?

Peter


...especially when you can fit a Dynamater that looks like a dynamo but with twice the output. Unless one does a lot of night time driving...unlikely.. it's just money down the drain... I should know! Rolling Eyes
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
alastairq



Joined: 14 Oct 2016
Posts: 2119
Location: East Yorkshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Possibly a 'space' issue? I note the alternator is mounted back-to-front?
_________________
Dellow Mk2, 1951 built, reg 1952.
Fiat 126 BIS
Cannon special [1996 registered. Built in 1950's]
----------------------------------------------
Ford Pop chassis, Ashley 1172 bodyshell, in pieces.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikeC



Joined: 31 Jul 2009
Posts: 1809
Location: Market Warsop, Nottinghamshire

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

peter scott wrote:
Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?

Peter


Because the original dynamo ran off the front of the crankshaft where the supercharger is now fitted; but fitting an alternator immediately renders the car ineligible for VSCC events - surely the whole point of the car?
_________________
in the garage: 1938 Talbot Ten Airline
Recently departed: 1953 Lancia Appia, 1931 Austin Seven, 1967 Singer Chamois, 1914 Saxon, 1930 Morris Cowley, 1936 BSA Scout, 1958 Lancia Appia coupe, 1922 Star 11.9 ... the list goes on!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7214
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikeC wrote:

Because the original dynamo ran off the front of the crankshaft where the supercharger is now fitted


I don't think any of these Rileys had the dynamo directly connected to the crankshaft and projecting out the front. There must be some other reason why they couldn't fit the dynamo on the other side of the engine as in the car pictured below. Perhaps the steering column was too long / couldn't be easily shortened?? Apologies for the off screen photo size. I just used an external link.

Peter


_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7103
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikeC wrote:
peter scott wrote:
Quite nicely done but why on earth does it need an ugly modern alternator?

Peter


Because the original dynamo ran off the front of the crankshaft where the supercharger is now fitted; but fitting an alternator immediately renders the car ineligible for VSCC events - surely the whole point of the car?


I would doubt there was ever any "point" to the car; save it looked a bit like something Riley might have produced. My guess is that at best it is an 'imp' substitute.?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Brent29



Joined: 07 Jun 2018
Posts: 63

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a beautiful Riley! Putting modern parts is inevitable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
peter scott



Joined: 18 Dec 2007
Posts: 7214
Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brent29 wrote:
That's a beautiful Riley! Putting modern parts is inevitable.


It may be inevitable but I'm sure they don't have to be visible.

Peter
_________________
https://www.nostalgiatech.co.uk
1939 SS Jaguar 2 1/2 litre saloon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ray White



Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 7103
Location: Derby

PostPosted: Thu Nov 25, 2021 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, the closer you look the more absurd the asking price.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Classic cars forum & vehicle restoration. Forum Index -> Classic & Vintage Cars, Lorries, Vans, Motorcycles etc - General Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
OCC Merch link
Forum T&C


php BB powered © php BB Grp.